Umutların ve Hayal Kırıklıklarının Sosyo-Kültürel Arka Planı: Türk Erkekleriyle Evlenen Kazakistanlı Kadınların Evlilik Memnuniyeti Üzerine Nitel Bir Çalışma

View/Open
Date
2020-02-28
Author
Nakipbayeva, Zhanar
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
Acik erisim
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item record
Abstract
The foreign marriages of Kazakhstani women with Turkish men started to increase the socio-cultural, economic and political relationships between Kazakhstan and Turkey. These marriages have many interconnected structures, such as individual differences, ethnicity, cultural features, spouse values, gender roles and place of residence. This study, taking into account the language, culture and geographical differences between Kazakhstan and Turkey, there was an attempt to understand the marital satisfaction in foreign marriage between the citizens of these two countries, through the eyes of women, especially the Kazakhstani women who are the main actors in this marriage. More specifically, this study examined factors that play an important role in satisfying the marriage of Kazakhstani women; expectations of Kazakhstani women from this marriage and their experience after marriage; purposes for their marriage; understanding “Turkish men”, “Marriage with Turkish men” in the perception of Kazakhstani women before marriage and after marriage; as well as the state of fulfillment of expectations in marriage were sociologically interpreted through the metaphor of “disappointment”. The empirical data of the study were implemented in total with 22 Kazakhstani women living in Kazakhstan (Astana, Almaty, Shymkent, Atyrau) and Turkey (Ankara, Istanbul) in 2018 and 2019. An in-depth interview was chosen as the method of collecting information. As a result of the analysis of these data obtained during the interview, it turned out that in the marriage of Kazakh women with Turkish men, instrumental reasons are basic, in addition to love and mutual feelings of sympathy, their expectations to create a strong family with a good man, and these expectations are met. In addition, it was found that relations between spouses, their relations with the social environment, with family and relatives of both spouses and cultural factors (religion, daily life practices, traditions, and language) play a decisive role in marital satisfaction of Kazakhstani women. Discussing marital satisfaction of Kazakhstani women in the framework of theories of dynamic goals and theories of ecosystems, it’s possible to conclude that although women married to foreigners encountered some problems and misunderstandings due to cultural differences that negatively affected their marital satisfaction, their expectations from marriages that have been fully implemented have a positive effect on their marital satisfaction. And also the justification of the reasons why they agreed to this marriage and the efforts of their Turkish spouses to make them happy, determine the marital satisfaction of Kazakhstani women positively. The results of this study were sociologically interpreted in the framework of the dynamic goals theory (Li and Fung; 2011) and the eco-system theory (Skowroński et al., 2014).
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11655/22459
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.Collections
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-citation
Irastorza ve Devoretz. (2009). Factors Affecting International Marriage Survival: A Theoretical Approach . Seminar On Bilingualism, (S. 20). www.365ınfo.Kz Bilgi Portalı (2015). Kazahstanki Vse Tsashe Vyhodyat Zamuj Za İnostrancev. Https://365info.Kz/2015/05/Kazaxstanki-Vse-Chashhe-VyxodyatZamuzh-Za-İnostrancev/ Adresinden Alınmıştır Abuzahra, K. G. (2004). Understanding Resilience İn Muslim-American Immigrant Women: An Examination Of Protective Processes. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Alliant International University. Ahmadi, H., ve Sadeghi. (2016). The Role Of Socio - Economic Status İn Marital Satisfaction. Turkish Journal Of Psychology , 31 (77), S. 43-47. Aida, Y., ve Falbo, T. (1991, Ocak). Relationships Between Marital Satisfaction, Resources, And Power Strategies. Sex Roles. A Journal Of Research , 1-2 (24), S. 43-56. Aistov, A. V., ve Leonova, L. A. (2012). Semeinyi Status i Udovletvorennost Zhiznyu. Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova (6), S. 5-10. Akın, A., ve Yalnız, A. (2015). Yaşam Memnuniyeti Ölçeği (Ymö) Türkçe Formu: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14 (54), S. 95-102. Ali, B. K., ve Abdikhalik, A. A. (2008). Ultaralıq Nekedeki Bilingvizimnin Otbası Jane Qogamdyk Qatynastarga İkpali. http://www.rusnauka.com/15_NPN_2013/Psihologia/7_138832.doc.htm Adresinden Alınmıştır Almakayeva, A. M. (2006). Subjektivnoe Kachestvo Zhiznyi: Osnovnye Problemy İssledovanya. Vestnik SamGU, S. 41-47. 287 Altun N. Ve Dinç A. (2016). Yabancı Gelinlerin Türk Ailesi İçindeki Yerine Sosyolojik Bir Bakış. Halk Kültüründe Aile Uluslar Arası Sempozyumu. Altunel, M. C., ve Akova, O. (2017). Yaşam Memnuniyetini Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Kapsamlı Bir Model Önerisi. Yaşam Memnuniyetini Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Kapsamlı Bir Model Önerisi (27), S. 217 - 235. Anaşkina, G. P., ve Pogodina, S. A. (2009). Brak s İnostrantsem Kak Novaya Model Adaptatsyi Rossyiskih Zhenshin v Usloviyah Perehodnogo Obshestva. EtnoZhurnal. Ulyanovsk, Rossya. Antonov, A. İ., Lebed, O. L., ve Sokolov, A. A. (2010). Udovletvorennost Zhiznyu, Semya i Brak v Rossyi i Evrope. Monitoring Obshestvennogo Mnenya, 3 (97), S. 61-69. Argynbayev, K. A. (1975). Semya i Brak u Kazakhov. Dissertatsyonnaya rabota (Tez çalışması), Almaty. Arvas, F., ve Hökelekli, H. (2017, Aralık). Dindarlık İle Evlilik Doyumu Ve Evlilikte Sorun Çözme İlişkisi Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi , 15 (34), S. 129-160. Aubakirova, Z. S., ve Zhunusova, E. R. (2017). Interracıal Marrıage In Kazakhstan: Evolutıon And Practıce. Ползуновский Альманах , 4 (4), S. 48-51. Bachofen, J. (1861). Materinskoye Pravo. (Е. V. Ryazanova, Çev.) Stuttgart. Bahmani, M., Aryamanesh, S., Bahmani, M., ve Gholami, S. (2013). Equity And Marital Satisfaction İn Iranian Employed And Unemployed Women. Social And Behavioral Sciences (84), S. 421 – 425. Balatskyi, E. V. (2005). Faktory Udovletvorennosti Zhiznyu: İzmereniye i İntegralnye Pokazateli. Мonitoring Obshestvennogo Mnenya, (4 (76)), S. 42-52. Batıgün, A. D., ve Sunal, A. B. (2017, Haziran). TV Dizilerinde Yer Alan Karakterlerle Kurulan Parasosyal Etkileşim: Evlilik Doyumu, Psikolojik Belirtiler ve Bazı 288 Sosyo-Demografik Değişkenler Açısından Değerlendirme. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 32 (79), S. 52–62. Baudiyarova, K. B. (2016). Qazaqstandagi Neke jane Otbası Maselesinin Zertteluyi: Ontustik Qazaqstan Aymagı Materiyaldari Negizinde. (A. B. Kalysh, Dü.) Almaty: Al-Farabi Qazaq Ulttyq Universiteti. Baudiyarova, K. B. (2015). Otbasyndagi Qarama-qaishylyq zhane Odan Shigudyn Zholdary. Otan Tarihy – Obshestvennaya İstorya, 2 (70), S. 175-179. Baudiyarova, K. B., ve Isayeva, A. I. (2015). Semeinyi Dosug – Odin iz Faktorov Braka. Vestnik KazNU im. Al-Farabi. Serya İstorya, 3 (78), S. 201-204. Belal, G. A.-S., ve Gaheen, M. A. (2016). Factors Affecting Marital Satisfaction Among Primigravida Women İn Tanta City, Egypt. Iosr Journal Of Nursing And Health Science (Iosr-Jnhs) , 5 (6), S. 71-78. Belous, E. V. (2011). Vzaimosvyaz Udovletvorennosti Brakom s Faktorami Sovmestimosti Suprugov. Vestnik Samarskoi Gumanitarnoi Akademyi. Serya ‘Psikhologya’, 1 (9), S. 94-103. Berry, R. E., ve Williams, F. L. (1987). Assessing The Relationship Between Quality Of Life And Marital And Income Satisfaction: A Path Analytic Approach. Journal Of Marriage And Family, 1 (49), S. 107-116. Beşel, F. (2015). 2013 Yılı Yaşam Memnuniyeti Araştırması Sonuçlarının İl Bazlı Ekonomik, Sosyal Ve Siyasi Analizi. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (5 (2)), S. 227-236. Beskova, T. V. (2013). Lıfe Satısfactıon And Attıtude To Success And Faılures Of Others: Gender And Age Aspects. Teorya i Praktika Obshestvennogo Razvitiya, S. 92-96. Bochkareva, E. V. (2017). Feminnost Zhenshin i İh Udovletvorennost Brakom. Vestnik Magistratury, 11-2 (74), S. 34-38. 289 Bogomolova, T. (2012, Oktyabr 23-25). Dizayn İssledovanya v Sotsyalnykh Naukah: Podhody i Realizatsya. Sotsyologya i Obshestvo: Globalnye Vyzovy i Regionalnoe Razvitie: Meteryaly IV Ocerednogo Vserossyiskogo Sotsyologicheskogo Kongressa. Ufa: Url: Http://Www.Ssarss.Ru/Files/File/Congress2012/Part73.Pdf Adresinden alınmıştır Boniwell, L. (2009). Time For Life: Satisfaction With Time Use And İts Relationship With Subjective Wellbeing. Saarbrucken, Germany: Vdm, 2009. Borisevkov, V. P., ve Gukalenko, O. V. (2014). İstitut Semyi i Semeinaya Politika v Sovremennoi Rossyi: Problemy, Tendencyi i Perspektivy. İnternet-Zhurnal ‘Naukovedenye’, 5 (24), S. 1-23. Borodina, V. N., ve Wacker, E. A. (2014). The Interrelatıon Between Strategıes Of Spouses’ Behavıor In Conflıct And Theır Marıtal Satısfactıon. Siberian Pedagogical Journal (5), S. 111-115. Botha, F., ve Booysen, F. (2014). Family Functioning And Life Satisfaction And Happiness İn South African Households. Social Indicators Research , 1 (119), 163–182. Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Assessing The Four Fundamental Domains Of Marriage. Family Relations (44), S. 459-468. Bradbury, T., Fincham, F., ve Beach, S. (2000). Research On The Nature And Determinants Of Marital Satisfaction: A Decade İn Review. Journal Of Marriage And The Family (62), S. 964–980. Brinkerhoff, D. B., ve White, L. K. (1978). Marital Satisfaction İn An Economically Marginal Population. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 2 (40), S. 259-267. Broman, C. L. (1988). Satisfaction Among Blacks: The Significance Of Marriage And Parenthood. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 50 (1), S. 45-51. 290 Bui, K.-V. T., Peplau, L. A., ve Hill, C. T. (1996). Testing The Rusbult Model Of Relationship Commitment And Stability İn A 15-Year Study Of Heterosexual Couples. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin (22), S. 1244-1257. Buluş, M., ve Bağcı, B. (2016). Evlilik Doyumu: Aile Yılmazlığı Ve Etkili İletişim Becerilerinin Rolü. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (40), S. 136-152. Burchinal, L. G., Hawkes, G. R., ve Gardner, B. (1957). Personality Characteristics and Marital Satisfaction. Source: Social Forces , 3 (35), S. 218-222. Burova, S. N. (2010). Sotsyologya Braka i Semyi: İstorya, Teoreticeskye Osnovy, Personalyy (BGU B). Campbell, A., Converse, P., ve Rodgers, ,. W. (1976). The Quality Of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, And Satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Canel, A. (2013). The Development Of The Marital Satisfaction Scale (Mss). Educatıonal Scıences: Theory ve Practıce (13 (1)), S. 97-117. Carroll, S. H., Hill, E. J., Yorgason, J. B., Larson, J. H., ve Sandberg, J. (2013). Couple Communication As A Mediator Between Work–Family Conflict And Marital Satisfaction. Contemp Fam Ther (35), S. 530–545. Çelik, M. (2006). Evlilik Doyum Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Çetin, H. (2018, Kasım). Kazaklar Türklerinde Çocuk İle İlgili Gerçekleştirilen Törenler ve Çocuk Terbiyesi. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi , 6 (15), S. 10881101. Çevik, N. K., ve Korkmaz, O. (2014). Türkiye’de Yaşam Doyumu ve İş Doyumu Arasındaki İlişkinin İki Değişkenli Sıralı Probit Model Analizi. Niğde Üniversitesi İibf Dergisi, 7 (1), S. 126-145. 291 Chadwick, B. A., Albrecht, S. L., ve Kunz, P. R. (1976). Marital And Family Role Satisfaction. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 3 (38), S. 431-440. Chan, A. Y., ve Smith, K. R. (1995). American Families: Race And Ethnicity . C. K. Jacobson (Dü.) İçinde, Perceptions Of Marital Stability Of Black-White İntermarriages. (S. 369-386). New-York: Guılford. Chee, H. L., Yeoh, B., ve Vu, T. K. (2012). From Client To Matchmaker: Social Capital İn The Making Of Commercial Matchmaking Agents İn Malaysia. Pacific Affair , 1 (85), S. 91-115. Copen, C. E., Daniels, K., Vespa, J., ve Mosher, W. D. (2012). First Marriages İn The United States: Data From The 2006-2010 National Survey Of Family Growth. . Natl Health Stat Report. Coşkuner, S. (2013). Akademisyenlerin İş Ve Aile Karakteristiklerinin Evlilik, Aile Ve Yaşam Tatmini İle İlişkisi: İş Ve Aile Çatışmasının Aracı Rolü. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi. Crohn, J. (1995). Mixed Matches: How To Create Successful Interracial, Interethnnic And Interfaith Relationships. New York: Fawcett Columbine. Daneshpour, M. (2009). Bridges Crossed, Paths Traveled: Muslim Intercultural Couples. T. A. Karis, ve K. Killian (Dü) İçinde, Intercultural Couples: Exploring Diversity İn Intimate Realtionships (S. 103). New York: Routledge Taylor ve Francis Group. Demaris, A., Sanchez, L. A., ve Krivickas, K. (Tarih Yok). Developmental Patterns İn Marital Satisfaction: Another Look At Covenant Marriage. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 5 (74), S. 989-1004. Deniz, A., ve Özgür, M. E. (2013, Şubat). Antalya'daki Rus Gelinler: Göçtan Evliliğe, Evlilikten Göçe. Sosyolojş Dergisi , 3 (27), S. 151-175. 292 Derebaşı, I. (İzmir). Evlilik Doyumu Ölçeğinin (Msı-R) Madde-Cevap Kuramına Dayalı Olarak Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi Ve Adaptasyon Çalışması. Ege Üniveristesi, Psikoloji, 2004. Dinç, S. Y., ve Şar, H. (2015). Polislerde Evlilik Doyumu İle Mesleki Tükenmişlik Arasındaki İlişkinin Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. International Journal Of Social Science (40), S. 485-507. Donahue, K. C., ve Ryder, R. G. (1982). A Methodological Note On Marital Satisfaction Varia- Bles. Journal Of Marriage And The Family (44), S. 743-747. Donovan, S. (2004). Stress And Coping Techniques İn Successful İntercultural Marriages (Master’s Thesis). Dorofeyeva, N. (2018, Mayıs 10-11). Vzaimosvyaz Lokusa Kontrolya Licnosti i Udovletvorennosti Brakom v Supruzheskoi Pare. Sotsyalnaya Psikhologya: Voprosy Teoryi i Praktiki. Materialy III Ezhegodnoi Nauchno-Prakticeskoi Konferentsyi Pamyati M.Yu.Kondratyeva, S. 22-24. Dubovskih, O. V., ve İlyınsky, S. V. (2015). Vliyanye Obraza Semyi Suprugov na ih Udovletvorennost Brakom. Vestnik Samarskoi Gosudarstvennoi Akademyi. Serya ‘Psikhologya’, 1 (17), S. 138-151. Dudley, M. G., Frederick, A., Kosinski, ve Jr. (1990). Review Of Religious Research. 1 (32), S. 78-86. Durualp, E., Kaytez, N., ve Girgin, B. A. (2017). Evlilik Doyumu Ve Maternal Bağlanma Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi (18 (2)), S. 129-138. Elshansky, S. P., Anufriyev, A. F., Kamalitdinova, Z. F., Saparin, O. E., ve Semenov, D. V. (2016). Udovletvorennost Brakom Kak Pozitivnoe Licnostnoe Kachestvo. (V. S. Belgogradskyi, O. V. Kasheeva, V. V. Zotova, ve İ. V. Antonenko, Dü) Gumanitarnye Osnovanya Sotsyalnogo Progressa: Rossya i Sovremennost: 293 Sbornik Statei Mezhdunarodnoi Nauchno-Prakticheskoi Konferentcyi. V 8 Tcastyah. Tcast 7 , S. 177-181. Ertürk, E.E., Beşirli, H., Dursun, T., (2004). Türk Cumhuriyetleri Öğrencilerinin Türk Dünyasına Bakışları. Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara. S. 251 Esensariyeva, Z. G. (2012). Rol Zhenshiny v Kazakhskoi Semye. Qainar Universitetinin Qabarshisy (2), S. 88-91. Eskin, M. (2012). Evlilik Terapisi İçin Başvuran Çiftlerin Evlilik Doyumu Ve Evlilik Terapisiyle Hakkındaki Görüşleriyle İlişkili Etmenler. Klinik Psikiyatri (15), S. 226-237. Evans, M. R., ve Kelley, J. (2004). Effect Of Famıly Structure On Lıfe Satısfactıon: Australıan Evıdence. Social Indicators Research (69), S. 303-349. Fard, M. K., ve Shahabi, R. (2012). Religiosity And Marital Satisfaction. World Conference On Psychology And Sociology (82), S. 307 – 311 . Fatehizadeh, M., ve Ahmadi, A. (2006). The Relationship Between Marital Satisfaction And Communication Patterns Of Couples İn Asfahan University. Journal Of Family Research (1 (2)), S. 109-20. Feschenko, E. M. (2012). Rolevye Ozhidanya i Prityazanya Suprugov na Raznykh Etapakh Razvitiya Semyi. Vestnik Bryanskogo Gosuniversiteta, 2 (1), S. 172-175. Fincham, F. D., ve Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The Assessment Of Marital Quality: A Reevaluation. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 4 (49), S. 797-809. Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R., ve Kemp-Fincham, S. I. (1997, 6 27). Marital Quality: A New Theoretical Perspective. Satisfaction İn Close Relationships , S. 275-304. Fowers, B., ve Olson, D. (1993). Enrıch Marital Satisfaction Scale: A Brief Research And Clinical Tool. Journal Of Family Psychology , 7 (2), S. 176-185. 294 Frisco, M. L., ve Williams, K. (2003, Ocak). Perceived Housework Equity, Marital Happiness, And Divorce İn Dual-Earner Households. Journal Of Family İssues , 1 (24). Fu, X., Tora, J., ve Kendall, H. K. (2001). Marital Happiness And Interracial Marriage: A Study İn A Multi-Ethnic Community İn Hawai. Journal Of Comparative Family Studies , 1 (32), S. 47–62. Galloway, S. C. (2006). Communication Behaviors, Perception Of Criticism, Changes İn Emotional State, And Relationship Satisfaction İn African American And Caucasian Heterosexual Couples. Family Science Theses And Dissertations. Gavrilenko, T. V. (2014). Refleksya Obshenya Suprugami i Udovletvorennost Brakom. Tcelovek. Soobshestvo. Upravlenye: Vzglyad Molodogo İssledovatelya: Materiyaly XIV Vseros. Nauch.-Prakt. Konf. / Pod. Red. S.D. Nekrasova. Krasnodar: Kubanskyi Gos. Un-t, S. 24-26. Gelles, R. J. (1995). Contemporary Families: A Sociolojical View. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Göker, G. (2015). Göç, Kimlik, Aidiyet: Kültürlerarası İletişim Açısından İsveçli Türkler. Konya: Literatürk Academia. Gökmen, Ç. E. (2011). Türk Turizminin Yabancı Gelinleri: Marmaris Yöresinde Turizm Sektöründe Çalışan Göçmen Kadınlar. Çalışma Ve Toplum (1), S. 201232. Golod, S. I. (1984). Stabilnost Semyi. Sotsiologicheskye i Demograficheskye Aspekty. L.: Nauka Gorsheneva, T. A. (2012). Problema Udovletvorennosti Zhiznyu Zhenshin na Raznykh Vozrostnykh Etapakh v Period Posle Razvoda. Nauchnye Vedomosti, 6 (125, 13), 217-220. 295 Gottman, J. M. (1994). What Predicts Divorce? The Relationship Between Marital Processes And Marital Outcomes. Hillsdale, Nj: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Gray-Little, B., ve Burks, N. (1983). Power And Satisfaction İn Marriage: A Review And Critique. Psychological Bulletin (93), S. 513-538. Greenstein, T. N. (2016). Gender, Marital Status And Life Satisfaction: A CrossNational Study. American Sociological Association, S. 1-17. Grote, N. K., ve Clark, M. S. (2001). Perceiving Unfairness İn The Family: Cause Or Consequence Of Marital Distress? Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 2 (80), S. 281-293. Güngör, A. (2009). Evli Bireylerin Sahip Oldukları İletişim Çatışması Türü, Romantik Kıskançlık Ve Duygusal Zeka Düzeylerinin Evlilik Doyumları Üzerine Etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Psikoloji, Ankara. Gurko, T. A. (1987). Udovletvorennost Brakom Kak Pokazatel Supruzheskikh Otnosheni. M. Gürsakal, S., ve Öngen, B. (2008). 2007 Yaşam Memnuniyeti Anketinin İstatistiksel Yöntemler İle Analizi . İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, S. 1-14. Gusarova, V. V., Krolevets, O. P., ve Cernobrovkina, S. V. (2016). Attrıbutıve Style Of Spouses As The Factor Of Satısfactıon Wıth Marrıage, Role Expectatıons And Claıms In Marrıage. Sbornik Konferentsyi: Aktivnost i Otvetstvennost Lichnosti v Kontekste Zhiznedeyatelnosti, S. 96-99. Güven, N., ve Sevim, S. (2007). İlişkilerle İlgili Bilişsel Çarpıtmalar Ve Algılanan Problem Çözme Becerilerinin Evlilik Doyumunu Yordama Gücü. Türk Psikolojik Danışma Ve Rehberlik Dergisi (28), S. 49-61. 296 Hamarta, E., Deniz, M., Dilmaç, B., ve Arslan, Ç. (2015). A Study On Marital Relationship And Marital Life Satisfaction With Regard To Values Of Marital Couples. International Journal Of Human Sciences , 12 (1), S. 55-69. Harchenko, K. V. (2011). Odovletvorennost: Metodologya i Opyt Munitsypialnykh İssledovanyi. M.: Alperya. Haylı, R. G., Durmuş, E., ve Kış, A. (2017). Evlilik Doyumunun Cinsiyet Açısından İncelenmesi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. Journal Of Human Sciences , 4 (14), S. 3329-3342. Haylı, R. G., Durmuş, E., ve Kış, A. (2017). Evlilik Doyumunun Cinsiyet Açısından İncelenmesi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması. Journal Of Human Sciences , 4 (14), S. 3328-3342. Heshmati, H.; Behnampour, N.; Arabameri, S.; Khajavi, S.; Kohan, N. (2016). Marital Satisfaction İn Refereed Women To Gorgan Health Centers. Iran J Psychiatry (11 (3)), S. 198-200. Hosseinkhanzadeh, A. A., ve Yeganeh, T. (2013). The Effects Of Life Skills Training On Marital Satisfaction. Social And Behavioral Sciences (84), S. 769 – 772. Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı Tez Tarama Merkezi (2019). Https://Tez.Yok.Gov.Tr/Ulusaltezmerkezi/ Adresinden Alınmıştır Hughes, D. M. (2004). The Role Of 'Marrıage Agencıes' In The Sexual Exploıtatıon And Traffıckıng Of Women From The Former Sovıet Unıon. International Review Ofvictimology. (11), S. 49-71. Hünler, O., ve Gençöz, T. (2003). Boyun Eğİci Davranışlar Ve Evlilik Doyumu İlişkisi: Algılanan Evlilik Problemleri Çözümünün Rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi , 18 (51), S. 99-108. Hurley, J. R., ve Palonen, D. (1967). Marital Satisfaction And Child Density Among University Student Parents. Journal Of Mar Riage And The Family (29), S. 483. 297 İmamura, A. (1990). Strangers İn A Strange Land: Coping With Marginality İn International Marriage. Journal Of Comparative Family Studies ( Vol. 21, No. 2), S. 171-191. 'Russkyi Mir' Bilgi Portalı. (2008). Brak s İnostrantsami: Prestuplenye ili Nakazanye? Https://Www.Russkiymir.Ru/Publications/85184/ Adresinden Alınmıştır Jones, G., ve Shen, H. (2008, February). International Marriage İn East And Southeast Asia: Trends And Research Emphases. Citizenship Studies (Vol. 12, No. 1), S. 9– 25. Kabakova, M. P., ve Musa, K. M. (2012 K Voprosu o Neobhodimosti SotsyalnoPsikhologicheskogo İssledovanya Polietnicheskoi Semyi v Kazakhstane. Vestnik KazNU im. Al-Farabi. Serya Psikhologyi i Sotsyologyi, 2 (41), S. 64-67. Kabasakal, Z., ve Soylu, Y. (2019). Evli Bireylerin Evlilik Doyumunun Cinsiyet Ve Eş Desteğine Göre İncelenmesi. Eğitim Ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi , 5 (4), S. 208-214. Kalmijn, M., Graaf, P. M., ve Janssen, J. (2005). Intermarriage And The Risk Of Divorce İn The Netherlands: The Effects Of Differences İn Religion And İn Nationality, 1974–94. A Journal Of Demography , 1 (59), S. 71-85. Kalysh, A. B. (2013). Semya i Brak v Kazakhstane. Almaty: Arys. Karataş, S. (1990). Yaşlılıkta Yaşam Doyumu Ve Etkileyen Etmenler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Hizmetler Yüksekokulu Dergisi , 8 (1-3), S. 105-114. Kastoryano, R. (2000). Kimlik Pazarlığı: Fransa Ve Almanya'da Devlet Ve Göçmen İlişkileri. (A. Berktay, Çev.) İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Kauanova, K. A. (1982). Obraz Zhiznyi i Byt Rabochikh Semei: (Na Materiyalakh Kazakhstana) Almaty: Nauka. 298 Kaya, A., ve Bozkur, B. (2015). Kadercilik Eğilimi Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi , 11 (3), S. 935-946. Kayabol, B. A. (2017). Relationship Maintenance Behaviours And Marital Satisfaction: The Mediator Roles Of Relational Equity And Appreciation. Doktora Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. Kazakistan Cumhuriyeti Anayasası. (1995). Offıcıal Sıte Of The Republic Of Kazakhstan: Https://Www.Akorda.Kz/Kz/Official_Documents/Constitution Adresinden Alınmıştır Khachatryan, L. A. (2011). Sovremennyi Brak – Rezultat Evolutsyi SemeinoBrachnykh Otnoshenyi. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Filosofya. Psikhologya. Sotsyologya (1 (5)), S. 89-100. Khafizova, L. İ., ve Kalinina, N. V. (2017). Osobennosti Udovletvorennosti Zhiznyu u Podrostkov s Razlichnymi Tipami Agressivnogo Povedenya. Psikhologya v Sovremennom Mire: Sbornik Statei Mezhdunarodnoi Nauchno-Prakticheskoi Konferentsyi. RGU im. A.N. Kosygina, S. 154-157. Kim, H. G. (2009). Factors İmpacting On The Crossborder Married Women’s Life Adaptation İn Rural Area, Gyungbook Province. Rural Sociology , 1 (19), S. 83120. Kırpık, C. (2009). Şehzade Evliliklerinde Değişim. Asosindex.Com/Cache/Articles/Article-1423910754.Pdf Adresinden Alınmıştır Kishinets, V. M. (1986). Udovletvorennost Brakom i Stabilnost Sovremennoi Gorodskoi Semyi: Problemy Empiricheskogo İssledovanya. Dissertatsya (Tez çalışması), Moskva. Klyueva, N. V. (2012). Vliyanye Semeinogo Stsenarya na Udovletvorennost Brakom. Vestnik YaRGu. Serya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2 (20), S. 128-134. 299 Kobayashi, M., Kobayashi, M., ve Okumura, T. (2016). Sharing Housework Between Husbands And Wives: How To İmprove Marital Satisfaction For Working Wives İn Japan. Journal Of Labor Policy , 5 (18), S. 2-15. Köksal, B., ve İlhan, T. (2018). Evlilik Rol Beklentileri Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi , 1 (19), S. 300-319. Koludarova, S. V. (2012). Demograficheskye Posledstviya Brakov s İnostrantsami Dlya Rossyi. Sbornik Konferentsyi NİTS Sotsiosfera (38), S. 100-102. Koludarova, S. V. (2010). Mezhnatsyonalnye Braki Kak Pokazatel Migratsyonnogo Protsessa. Sbornik Konferentsyi NİTS Sotsiosfera, S. 55-56. Koo, C. S. (2007). Study On The İnterracially Married Female İmmigrant’s Adaptation Of Multicultural Family. Korean Journal Of Family Social Work (20), S. 319360. Korableva, N. B., Antonova, N. L., ve Gerasimova, M. B. (2005.). Klientki Brachnogo Agentstva: Shtrikhi k Portretu. Sotsyologicheskye İssledovanya (№ 11. ), S. 142144. Korneeva, S. V. (2006). Mezhnatsyonalnye Braki s İnostrannim Partnerom v Sovremmennykh Uslovyakh Rossyiskogo Obshestva: Sotsyologicheskyi Analiz. Uchebnye Zapiski (1), S. 106-110. Kornyukh, A. O. (2014). Mezhnatsyonalnyi Brak v Kontekste İzuchenya Transformatsyonnykh İzmenenyi İnstituta Semyi i Braka. Almanakh Sovremennoi Nauki i Obrazovaya (12 (90)), S. 62-64. Korosteleva, E. A., ve Nas, S. (2011). İssledovanye Otnositelno Problem v RusskoTuretskikh Smeshannykh Brakakh. Vestnik Magistratury, S. 28-35. Kovalyov, E. M., ve Steinberg, İ. E. (2009). Kachestvennye Metody v Polevykh Sotsyologicheskikh İssledovanyakh. (İ. Shteinberg, Dü.), Aletya. 300 Kozlov, V. (2017). Kazakhstan i Estonya: Otsenka Predpochtenyi Pri Vstuplenyi v Mezhnatsyonalnye Braki. Naselenye i Ekonomika, 1 (1), S. 71-88. Kulaykin, V. I., Zadesenets, E. E., ve Zarakovskyi, G. M. (2008). Kontseptsya Kachestva Zhizni Kak İnstrument Upravlenya Sotsiyalno-Ekonomicheskim Razvitiyem Rossyi. Http://Www.Rusrand.Ru/Dokladi2/Kulaikin.Pdf Adresinden alınmıştır Kwan, Y.-K. (2008). Life Satisfaction And Family Structure Among Adolescents İn Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research , 86 (1), S. 59-67. Kye, S.-J., Kang, H.-K., ve Jeong, M.-S. (2009). The Study On The Marital Life Factors For The Multi-Culture Families: Focused On The Case Study Of Multi-Culture Family İn Younsan-Gu. Journal Of Korean Family Resource Management , 3 (13), S. 31–57. Land, K. C., ve Ferriss, A. L. (2006). The Socıology Of Socıal Indıcators. Http://Www.Soc.Duke.Edu/~Cwi/Section_I/I19thesociologyofsocialındicators.Pd f. Larson, J. H. (2000). Should We Stay Together?: A Scientifically Proven Method For Evaluating Your Relationship And İmproving İts Changes For Long-Term Sucess. San Francisco: Josse- Bass A Wiley Company. Lastochkina, M. A. (2012). Faktory Udovletvorennosti Zhiznyu: Otsenka i Empiricheskyi Analiz. Sotsyologicheskye Obsledovanya (5), S. 132-141. Lavner, J. A., ve Clark, M. A. (2017). Workload And Marital Satisfaction Over Time: Testing Lagged Spillover And Crossover Effects During The Newlywed Years. Journal Of Vocational Behavior (101), S. 67-76. Lawrence, E., ve Nylen, K. (2007). Prenatal Expectations And Marital Satisfaction Over The Transition To Parenthood. Journal Of Family Psychology (21), S. 155–164. 301 Lebaron, A., Kelley, H., ve Jason S. (2018). Money Over Marriage: Marriage Importance As A Mediator Between Materialism And Marital Satisfaction. Journal Of Family And Economic (39), S. 337–347. Lee, H., Williams, L., ve Arguillas, F. (2016). Adapting To Marriage Markets: International Marriage Migration From Vietnam To South Korea. Journal Of Comparative Family Studies (Vol. 47, No. 2), S. 267-28. Lee, H.-K. (2008). İnternational Marriage And The State İn South Korea: Focusing On Govermental Policy. Citizenship Studies , 107-123. Lee, W.-S., ve Mckinnish, T. (2018). The Marital Satisfaction Of Differently Aged Couples. J Popul Econ (31), S. 337–362. Lee, Y.-J. (2006). The 3rd World Congress Of Korean Studies İn Jeju, Korea . Increasing International Marriages İn Korea: A Sociological Analysis , (S. 1-20). Li, T., ve Fung, H. H. (2011). The Dynamic Goal Theory Of Matital Satisfaction. Review Of General Psychology , 15 (3), S. 246–254 . Litvinova, İ. A. (2011). Spetsifika Sotsyalnykh Setei Migrantov. İdei i İdealy, 2 (3(9), S. 63-69. Luckey, E. B. (1964). Marital Satisfaction And Personality Correlates Of Spouse. Journal Of Marriage And Family, , 2 (26), S. 217-220. Luckey, E. B., ve Bain, J. K. (Tarih Yok). Children: A Factor İn Marital Satisfaction. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 1 (32), S. 43-44. Luehrmann, S. (2004). Mediated Marriage: İnternet Matchmaking İn Provincial Russia. Europe-Asıa Studıes , 56 (6), S. 857–875. Lysenko, L. M. (2015). O Roli Zhenshiny v Sovremennom Obshestve. Nauchnoİzdatelskyi Tsentr Sfera: Http://Sociosphera.Com/Publication/Conference/2015/100/O_Roli_Zhenwiny_V_ Sovremennom_Obwestve/ Adresinden Alınmıştır 302 Madanian, L., ve Syed Mansor, S. M. (2013). Marital Satisfaction And Demographic Traits İn An Emigrant Sample: Rasch Analysis. Social And Behavioral Sciences (102), S. 96 – 103. Makarova, İ. A. (2014). Mezhetnicheskyi Brak: Kontseptualizatsya Ponyatya. İsvestya Rossyiskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta (164), S. 150154. Maxwell, J. (2012). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, Edition 3. Sage Publications. Mcfadden, J., ve Moore Iıı, J. L. (2001). Intercultural Marriage And İntimacy: Beyond The Continental Divide. International Journal For The Advancement Of Counselling (23), S. 261–268. Mclennan, J. F. (1865). Primitive Marriage . Edinburg: Adam And Charles Black. Miles, M., ve Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications. Miller, B. C. (1975). Child Density, Marital Satisfaction, And Conventionalization: A Research Note. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 2 (37), S. 345-347. Minnotte, K. L., Pedersen, D., ve Mannon, S. E. (2010). The Emotional Terrain Of Parenting And Marriage: Emotion Work And Marital Satisfaction. The Social Science Journal (47 ), S. 747–761. Mirfardi, A., Edalati, A., ve Redzuan, M. (2010). Relationships Between Background Factors And Female Marital Satisfaction. Journal Of Social Sciences (6 (3)), 447452. Morgan, C., Hoffmann, J. P., ve John, P. H. (2007). Internatıonal Marrıages In Japan: A Prefecture-Level Analysıs. International Journal Of Sociology Of The Family (Vol 33, No. 1 ), S. 157-182 . 303 Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient Society. Researches İn The Lines Of Human Progress From Savagery, Through Barbarism To Civilization. New-York: Henry Holt And Company. Morris, A. (2015). A Practical İntroduction To İn-Depth İnterviewing . Sage. Mósmann, C., Wagner, A., ve Feres-Carneiro, T. (2007). Qualidade Conjugal: Mapeando Conceitos. Paideia , S. 777-784. Narimani, M., Porzoor, P., Atadokht, A., ve Abbasi, M. (2015). The Role Of Spiritual Well-Being And Religious Adherence İn Predicting Marital Satisfaction Among Nurses. Journal Of Clinical Nursing And Midwifery. , 3 (4), S. 1-10. Necheporenko, O. P., ve Samchenko, E. M. (2014). Features Marrıage Satısfactıon And Role Expectatıons Of Spouses Wıth Occasıonal Separatıon. Вестник Омского Университета. Серия «Психология». (1), S. 52–58. Negy, C., ve Snyder, D. K. (2000). Relationship Satisfaction Of Mexican American And Non-Hispanic White American Interethnic Couples: Issues Of Acculturation And Clinical Intervention. Journal Of Marital ve Family Therapy (26), S. 293304. Neuman, L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative And Quantitative Approaches. Nomura, T. (2007). Perceptions Of Marriage: Recent Japanese İmmigrant Women İn The Greater Toronto Area (Master’s Thesis). Nugayev, R. M., ve Nugayev, M. A. (2003). Kachestvo Zhizni v Trudakh Sotsyologov SSHA. Sotsyologicheskoe İssledovanye (6), S. 100-105. Okitikpi, T. (2009). Understanding Interracial Relationships. Dorset, Uk: Russell House Publishing Ltd. Olson, D. H., ve Fowers, B. J. (1989). Enrıch Marital Satisfaction Scale: Reliability And Va- Lidity. Unpublished Manuscript, Department Of Educational And 304 Psychological Studies, P. O. Box 248065, University Of Miami, Coral Gables, Fl 33124. Orathinkal, J., ve Vansteenwegen, A. (2006). Religiosity And Marital Satisfaction. Contemp Fam Ther (26), S. 497–504. Oshio, T., Nozaki, K., ve Kobayashi, M. (2013). Division Of Household Labor And Marital Satisfaction İn China, Japan, And Korea. J Fam Econ Iss (34), S. 211– 223. Osinowo, H. O., ve Oyefeso, A. (1990). The Development Of A Scale Of Marıtal Satısfactıon For Women. International Journal Of Sociology Of The Family , 2 (20), S. 229-236. Osipov, G. V. (1979). Teorya i Praktika Sotsyologicheskogo İssledovanya v SSSR. M.: Nauka. Pakravan, E., Haghayegh, S., Nshatdoust, H., ve Molavi, H. (2014). Efficacy Of Problem Solving Method On The Marital Satisfaction And Psychological Profile Of The Couples Of Brojen City. Culture Counseling. , 4 (16), S. 15-31. Pakravan, E., Haghayegh, S., Nshatdoust, H., ve Molavi, H. (2014). Efficacy Of Problem Solving Method On The Marital Satisfaction And Psychological Profile Of The Couples Of Brojen City. Culture Counseling. , 4 (16), S. 15-31. Parlaz, S. (2013, Eylül). Osmanlı Hanedan Evlilikleri Üzerine Bazı Notlar. Tarih Okulu Dergisi (15), S. 57-89. Pedersen, D., ve Minnotte, K. L. (2012). Dual Earner Husbands And Wives: Marital Satisfaction And The Workplace Culture Of Each Spouse. J Fam Econ Iss (33), S. 272–282. Petrenko, V. F. (2011). Kostruktivism Kak Novaya Paradigma v Naukakh O Tcheloveke. Voprosy Filosofyi (6), S. 75-81. 305 Piper, N. (2003). Wife Or Worker? Worker Or Wife? Marriage And Cross-Border Migration İn Contemporary Japan. Int. J. Popul. Geogr. (9), 457–469. Pochagina, O. (2008). Transgranichnye Braki: Kitai i Yuzhnaya Korea. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka (2), 125-137. Polatcı, S. (2015). Örgütsel Ve Sosyal Destek Algılarının Yaşam Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi: İş Ve Evlilik Tatmininin Aracılık Rolü. Ekonomik Ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi , 11 (2), S. 25-44. Polatcı, S. (2015). Örgütsel Ve Sosyal Destek Algılarının Yaşam Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi: İş Ve Evlilik Tatmininin Aracılık Rolü. International Journal Of Economic ve Social Research , 2 (11), S. 25-44. Poluhina, E. (2017). Dizayn Sotsyologicheskogo İssledovanya: Kratkyi Obzor Sovremennykh Praktik. (V. V. Semenova, Dü.) Sovremennye İssledovatelskye Praktiki v Sotsyologyi: Sbornik Materiyalov Konferentsyi Molodykh Uchenykh, S. 45-56. Rebello, K., ve Et. (2014). Fundamental Factors In Marital Satisfaction:An Assessment Of Brazilian Couples. Psychology (5), Pp. 777-784. Reiter, M. D., Richmond, K., Stirlen, A., ve Kompel, N. (2009). Exploration Of İntimacy İn The İntercultural And İntracultural Romantic Relationships İn College Students. College Student Journal , 4 (43), S. 1080-1083. Renalds, T. G. (2011). Communication İn Intercultural Marriages: Managing Cultural Differences And Conflict For Marital Satisfaction. (Master’s Thesis). Roach, A. J., Frazier, L. P., ve Bowden, S. R. (1981). The Marital Satisfaction Scale: Development Of A Measure For Intervention Research. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 3 (43), S. 537-546. Rollins, B. C., ve Feldman, H. (1970). Marital Satisfaction Over The Family Life Cycle. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 1 (32), S. 20-28. 306 Romano, B. (1988). İntercultural Marriage: Promisses And Pitfalls. Me: Yarmouth. İntercultural Press. Romanova, E. V., ve Sherbakova, A. S. (2011). Vliyanye Opyta Vzaimootnoshenyi v Roditelskoi Semye na Formirovanye Supruzheskykh Otnoshenyi i Udovletvorennost Brakom. Vestnik SPBGU. Ser. 12. (3), S. 121-128. Rosario, T. (2005). Bridal Diaspora: Migration And Marriage Among Filipino Women. Indian Journal Of Gender Studies (12), 253-273. Rostami, A. M., ve Gol, H. C. (2014). Prediction Of Marital Satisfaction Based On Spiritual Intelligence. Social And Behavioral Sciences (116), S. 2573 – 2577. Sağlam, F. (2006). Türk - Alman Örnekleminde Karma Evli Çiftlerin Çocuklarındaki Dilsel Gelişim Üzerine. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi , 23, S. 231-241. Savenysheva, S. S., ve Engelgardt, E. E. (2016). K Voprosu o Faktorakh Udovletvorennosti Brakom Suprugov v Sovremennoi Rossyiskoi Semye. Peterburgskyi Psikhologicheskyi Zhurnal (14), S. 82-100. Seah, M. (2012). 'The Famıly' As An Analytıcal Tool: Cases From International Marriages And Marriage Migration İn East Asia. International Journal Of Sociology Of The Family (Vol. 38, No. 1), S. 63-84. Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing As Qualitative Research: A Guide For Researchers İn Education And The Social Sciences (Fourth Edıtıon B.). New York: Teachers College Press. Semenova, B. B. (1998). Kachestvennye Metody: Vvedenye v Gumanisticheskuyu Sotsyologiyu: Ucheb. Posobiye Dlya Studentov Vuzuv. Dobrosvet. Serdyukova, E. F. (2016). İssledovanye Vzaimosvyazi Mezhdu Udovletvorennostyu Brakom i Udovletvorennostyu Professionalnoi Deyatelnostyu v Blagopoluchnykh 307 i Neblagopoluchnykh Semeinykh Parakh. İzvestya Chechenskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, S. 71-76. Shachar, R. (1991). His And Her Marital Satisfaction: The Double Standard. Sex Roles , 7-8 (25), S. 451-467. Shin, Y.-K., ve Chang, J.-K. (2010). A Case Study On Adaptability Factors İn Family Life For Vietname Multi-Cultural Families İn Korea İn Terms Of The InterCulturalism. Korean Family Resource Management Association , 3 (14), S. 109122. Shiryaev, E. P. (2017). İssledovanye Stepeni Udovletvorennosti Brakom i İyerarkhyi Semeynykh Ustanovok Suprugov. Sbornik Konferentsyi Vesennye PsikhologoPedagogicheskye Tchtenya, S. 141-144. Silayeva, K. A. (2018, Mayıs 10-11). Zavisimost Udovletvorennosti Brakom Ot Sovmestnogo ili Razdelnogo Prozhvanya s Roditelyami. Sotsyalnya Psikhologya: Voprosy Teoryi i Praktiki. Materialy III Ezhegodnoi Nauchno-Prakticheskoi Pamyati M.Yu.Kondratyeva, S. 205-207. Skowroński, D. P., Othman, A. B., Wen Siang, D. T., Wei Han, G. L., Jia Yang, J. W., ve Waszyńska, K. (2014). The Outline Of Selected Marital Satisfaction Factors İn The Intercultural Couples Based On The Westerner And Non-Westerner Relationships. Polish Psychological Bulletin , 3 (45), S. 346-356. Smagulov, K. (2011). Sovremennaya Religioznaya Situatsya v Kazakhstane. Tsentralnaya Azya i Kavkaz, 14 (3), S. 53-73. Smoleva, E. O., ve Morev, M. V. (2016). Udovletvorennost Zhiznyu i Uroven Schastya: Vzglyad Sotsyologa. Vologda, Rossya: İSERT RAN. Snyder, D. K. (1979). Multidimensional Assessment Of Marital Satisfaction. Journal Of Marriage And Family , 4 (41), S. 813-823. 308 Solsberry, P. W. (1994). Interracial Couples İn The United States Of America: Implications For Mental Health Counselling. Jurnal Of Mental Haelth Counselling (16), S. 304-317. Sopun, S. M., ve Liders, A. K. (2007). Psikhologicheskaya Sovmestimost Supruzheskoi Pary i Udovletvorennost Brakom. Sotsyalnaya Psikhologya (27), S. 156-162. Sorokin, P. (1916). Krizis Sovremennoi Semyi. Ezhemesyachnyi Zhurnal Dlya Vsekh (2-3), S. 166. Stolyarskaya, E. V., ve Zhuk, O. G. (2010 Vzaimosvyaz Udovletvorennosti Brakom i Urovnya Samoaktualizatsyi Lichnosti Suprugov Na Raznykh Etapakh Zhiznennogo Tsikla Semyi. Psikhologicheskyi Zhurnal, 41-46. Sung, B. L. (1990). Chinese American İntermarriage. Journal Of Comparative Family Studies , 3 (21), S. 337-352. Sung, M., Chın, M., Lee, J., ve Lee, S. (2013). Ethnic Variations İn Factors Contributing To The Life Satisfaction Of Migrant Wives İn South Korea. Family Relations (62), S. 226–240. Suzuki, N. (2007). Marrying A Marilyn Of The Tropics: Manhood And Nationhood İn Filipina-Japanese Marriages. Anthropological Quarterly , 80 (2), S. 427-454. Şimşir, B., N. (1993). Yeni Türk Cumhuriyetleri ve Türkiye 1991 Yılındaki Gelişmeler. Değişen Dünyada Türkiye ve Türk Dünyası Sempozyumu (Bildiriler). Ankara Kartashova T. (2009). Young People’s Marrıage Motıvatıon. Uchenye Zapiski SPBGİPSR. Tangalycheva, R. K., ve Tsoy, T. E. (2011). Kulturnye Razlichya v KoreiskoRossyskikh Smeshannykh Brakakh. Vestnik SPBGU. Ser., 12 (3), 299-309. Tavakol, Z., Moghadam, Z. B., Nasrabadi, A. N., Iesazadeh, N., ve Esmaeili, M. (2016). Marital Satisfaction Through The Lens Of Iranian Women: A Qualitative Study. Pan African Medical Journal. (25:208), S. 1-7. 309 Tay, D. J., Wan, M. H., Ying, C. T., ve Fernandez, T. M. (2012). Comparison Of Couple Dynamics And Family Factors Between Singaporean Monocultural And Intercultural Couples. Temasek Polytechnic, Singapore. Temirgalyeva, Y. E. (2010). Udovletvorennost Brakom i Predstavlenye Suprugov o Semeinom Schastye. Vestnik KRSU, 10 (11), S. 95-99. Tengri News. (2007). Kazakhstanki Predpochitayut Vykhodit Zamuzh za İnostrancev iz Dalnego Zarubezhya: Https://Tengrinews.Kz/Kazakhstan_News/KazahstankiPredpochitayut-Vyihodit-Zamuj-İnostrantsev-200702/ Adresinden Alınmıştır Tezer, E. (1996). Evlilik İlişkisinden Sağlanan Doyum: Evlilik Yaşamı Ölçeği. Psikolojik Danışma Ve Rehberlik Dergisi , 2 (7), S. 1-7. Tezer, E. (1992). Evlilik. Doyumu Ve İş Doyumu T Bir Ön Çalışma. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi , 1 (3), S. 24-26. Ting, K.-F. (2014). The Changing Pattern Of Marital Satisfaction İn Hong Kong. Journal Of Comparative Family Studies, 1 (45), S. 113-126. Tolstaya, S., ve Topal, L. (2009). Udovletvorennost Brakom v Period Krizisa Srednego Vozrasta. Studıa Unıversıtatıs, 9 (29), S. 185-189. Troost, A. V., Matthijs, K., Vermulst, A. A., Gerris, J. R., ve Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J. (2006). Effects Of Spousal Economic And Cultural Factors On Dutch Marital Satisfaction. Journal Of Family And Economic Issues , 2 (27), S. 235-260. Tsallagova, İ. V. (1996). Voprosy Zhenskoi Migratsyi v Sredstvakh Massovoi İnformatsyi. Gendernye Aspekty Sotsyalnoi Transformatsyi, S. 25-256. Tüik. (2016). Yaşam Memnuniyeti Araştırması. Haber Bülteni. Tyuryukanova, E. V. (1996). Migratsya Zhanshin İz Rossyi: Eshe Odna ‘Strategya Uspekha?’. Gendernye Aspekty Sotsyalnoi Transformatsyi, S. 84-103. 310 Ualiyeva, S. K. (2017). Tendencies Of The İnterethnic Marriages İn Kazakhstan. World Of Great Altay , 3 (3), S. 405-413. Ualiyeva, S. K., ve Edgar, E. (2011). Mezhetnicheskye Braki, Smeshannoe Proiskhozhdenye i ‘Druzhba Narodov’ v Sovetskom i Postsovetskom Kazakhstane. Neprikosnovennyi Zapas (6), S. 234-244. Ubesekera, D. M., ve Luo, J. (2008). Marriage And Family Life Satisfaction: A Literature Review. Sabaramuwa University Journal, 6 (1), S. 1-17. Popova V.V., ve Vereshagina M.V., (2015). The Concept Of Relıgıous And Ethnıc Identıty. Internatıonal Research Journal, 6 (37), S. 55-56. Vagapova, A. R., ve Perova, S. A. (2015). Semeynaya İdentichnost Suprugov i ih Otsenka Stepeni Udovletvorennosti Brakom. İzv. Sarat. Un-ta. Nov. Ser. Akmeologya Obrazovanya. Psikhologya Razvitya, 4 (1 (13)), S. 72-76. Vaijayanthimala, K., Kumari, K. B., ve Panda, B. (2004). Socio-Economic Heterogomy And Marital Satisfaction. J. Hum. Ecol, 1 (15), S. 9-11. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments In Satısfactıon-Research. Social Indicators Research, 37, S. 1-46. Voronovich, D. V. (2010). İzmemenye Udovletvorennosti Brakom i Dominiruyushikh Sfer Supruzheskikh Konfliktov v Processe Razvitya Semyi. Vestnik BDU. Ser. 3. (3), S. 52-55. Voskovskaya, L. V., ve Haladzhiyeva, D. S. (2016). Osobennosti Predstavlenyi o Brachnom Partnere Kak Faktor Udovletvorennosti Brakom. Evrazyiskyi Soyuz Uchevykh (ESU), 1 (22), S. 124-127. Vural Batik, M., ve Kalkan, M. (2017). Evlilikte Algılanan Sorun Çözme Becerileri Ve Evlilik Doyumu. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6 (5), 26302646 . 311 Wallin, P. (1957). Religiosity, Sexual Gratification, And Marital Satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 3 (22), S. 300-305. Whisman, M. A., ve Jacobson, N. S. (1989). Depression, Marital Satisfaction, And Marital And Personality Measures Of Sex Roles. Journal Of Marital And Family Therapy, 15 (2), S. 177-186. Yang, O. K., Song, M. K., ve Im, S. W. (2009). A Study On Acculturation Stress Of İnternationally-Married Female Migrants İn Seoul. Journal Of Family Relations, 1 (14), S. 137-168. Yem, N. B. (2013). Zhenshinyi Tsentralnoi Azyi v Brake Migratsyi Yuzhnoi Korey (Polovye Disproportsyi Kak Faktor Brachnogo Rynka Mezhetnicheskogo Braka). Vestnik KazNU im. Al-Farabi. Serya Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenya i Mezhdunarodnoe Pravo. (1 (61)), S. 64-70. Yem, N. (2015). Uroven Udovletvorennosti Semeinoy Zhiznyu Brachnymi Migrantami v Yuzhnoi Koree: Faktory Vliyanya na Primere Etnicheskikh Koreitsev SHG. KazNU Bulletin. Oriental Series, №2 (72), S. 58-63. Yi'en, C. (2012). Transnational Masculinities İn Situ: Singaporean Husbands And Their İnternational Marriage Experiences. Area (Vol. 44, No. 1), S. 76-82. Yıldız, M. A., ve Çevik, G. B. (2016). Evli Bireylerin Evlilik Doyumlarının Ve Yaşam Doyumlarının İncelenmesi. International Journal Of Human Sciences, 13 (1), S. 227-242. Yılmaz, A. (2001). Eşler Arasındaki Uyum: Kuramsal Yaklaşımlar Ve Görgül Çalışmalar. Aile Ve Toplum Dergisi, 1 (4). Zaheri, F., Dolatian, M., Shariati, M., Simbar, M., Ebadi, A., ve Azghadi6, S. (2016). Effective Factors İn Marital Satisfaction İn Perspective Of Iranian Women And Men: A Systematic Review. Electronic Physician, 8 (12), S. 3369-3377. 312 Zainah, A. Z., Nasir, R., Hashim, R. S., ve Yusof, N. (2012). Effects Of Demographic Variables On Marital Satisfaction. Asian Social Science, 8 (9), S. 46-49. Zhanazarova, Z. Z. (2012). Rol Zhenshinyi v Kazakhskoi Semye. Vestnik Universiteta Kainar (2), S. 88-91. Zimmerman, T. S. (2000). Marital Equality And Satisfaction İn Stay-At-Home Mother And Stay-At-Home Father Families. Contemporary Family Therapy Volume (22), S. 337–354. Zolotnyik, L. (2014). A Sociological View On Marital Satisfaction: Measuring Capabilities. Russian Sociological Review, 12 (2). Zurabyan, М. М. (2014). Regulyatsya Emotsyonalnogo Napryazhenya Suprugami i Udovletvorennost Brakom. (S. D. Nekrasov, Dü.) Tchelovek. Soobshestvo. Upravlenye: Vzglyad Molodogo İssledovatelya: Materialy XIV Vseros. Nauch.Prakt. Konf., S. 35-37