Original Article Once-monthly continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) for haemoglobin maintenance in haemodialysis patients with chronic renal anaemia Neval Duman1, Abdullah Uyanik2, Abdulkadir Unsal3, Siren Sezer4, Taner Camsari5, Mustafa Cirit6, Mehmet Emin Yilmaz7, Bülent Altun8, Murat Duranay9, Alaattin Yildiz10, Idris Sahin11, Ayhan Dogukan12, Sedat Ustundag13, Ibrahim Karayaylali14, Arzu Kahveci15, Sukru Sindel16, Ahmet Alper Kiykim17, Yavuz Yenicerioglu18, Ertugrul Akbas19 and Fatih Ozdener19 1Department of Nephrology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey, 2Department of Nephrology, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey, 3Nephrology Clinic, Sisli Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, 4Department of Nephrology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey, 5Department of Nephrology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey, 6Nephrology Clinic, Izmir Ataturk Research and Training Hospital, Izmir, Turkey, 7Department of Nephrology, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey, 8Department of Nephrology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey, 9Nephrology Clinic, Ankara Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, 10Department of Nephrology, Istanbul University Istanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 11Department of Nephrology, Inonu University School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey, 12Department of Nephrology, Firat University School of Medicine, Elazig, Turkey, 13Department of Nephrology, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey, 14Department of Nephrology, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey, 15Department of Nephrology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 16Department of Nephrology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey, 17Department of Nephrology, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey, 18Department of Nephrology, Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine, Aydin, Turkey and 19Roche Pharmaceuticals Medical Department, Istanbul, Turkey Correspondence and offprint requests to: Neval Duman; E-mail: nevalduman@gmail.com Abstract Background. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-monthly con- tinuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) for maintenance of stable haemoglobin (Hb) levels in adult chronic renal anaemia patients on dialysis according to local clinical judgment in Turkey. Methods. This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multi-centre study conducted in 20 centres in Turkey. After a 4-week screening period, eligible patients receiving conventional erythropoiesis- stimulating agents were converted to monthly intravenous CERA and entered a 16-week CERA dose- titration period (DTP) followed by an 8-week efficacy evaluation period (EEP) and a 4-week safety follow-up. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose Hb concentration remained stable within ±1.0 g/dL of their reference Hb and within the range of 10.0–12.0 g/dL during the EEP. Results. A total of 173 patients were screened, 132 entered the DTP and 84 completed the study. Thirty-nine patients [46.4% (95% confidence interval: 35.5–57.7%)] maintained stable target Hb con- centrations. The mean change in time-adjusted average Hb concentration was 0.29 ± 1.08 g/dL between baseline and the EEP. The mean CERA monthly dose was 112.4 ± 76.78 µg during the EEP, and the CERA dose was adjusted in 39 patients (36.4%). Eleven patients (8.4%) reported 13 treat- ment-related adverse events, the most frequent adverse events being infections and infestations, gastrointestinal and vascular disorders. Conclusions. Once-monthly CERA maintains stable Hb concentrations in chronic renal anaemia patients on dialysis in Turkey. The study results confirm the known efficacy and safety profile of CERA. Keywords: anaemia; dialysis; erythropoietin receptor; kidney disease Introduction Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are a well-ac- cepted treatment option for anaemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) [1–5]. Two types of recombinant human erythropoietin have been available for clinical use since ESAs first became available on the market: epoetin alpha and epoetin beta [6, 7]. Both epoetin alpha and epoetin beta are effective but short-acting. Subsequently, ESAs with an extended duration of action were developed—darbepoe- tin alfa andmethoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta. In contrast to erythropoietin, continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) shows a different activity at the receptor level characterized by a slower association to and © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. Clin Kidney J (2014) 0: 1–6 doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfu079 D ow nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /ckj/article-abstract/7/5/464/317605 by H AC ETTEPE U N IVER SITY M ED IC AL C EN TER LIBR AR Y user on 28 O ctober 2019 faster dissociation from the receptor, which results in a considerably increased half-life allowing longer (one- month) dosing intervals [8–11]. CERA has a prolonged half-life after intravenous (i.v.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) administration [12]. In Phase III trials, CERA has demonstrated efficacy in anaemia correction when administered every 2 weeks [13, 14] and every 4 weeks [15] and maintaining haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations within the target range when adminis- tered once-monthly for Hb maintenance in patients with renal anaemia [16–19]. In this study, we aimed to assess the maintenance of stable Hb concentrations with once-monthly i.v. CERA in haemodialysis patients with chronic renal anaemia previ- ously treated with ESAs. We also aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of once-monthly i.v. CERA in these patients. Materials and methods Study design and population This single-arm, open-label study was performed in 20 centres in Turkey. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age 18 years or older, diagnosis of chronic renal anaemia Hb concentration between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL, adequate iron status [serum ferritin >100 ng/mL and transferrin saturation (TSAT) >20% or hypochromic red cells <10%], continuous i.v. or s.c. maintenance of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta or darbe- poetin alpha therapy with the same dosing interval during the previous month and no change in total (calculated) weekly dose, regular long-term haemodialysis therapy with the same mode of dialysis for at least the previous 3 months, Kt/V ≥1.0 or urea reduction ratios of ≥55% at screening for haemodialysis patients. Exclusion criteria were as follows: transfusion of red blood cells during the previous 2 months, poorly controlled hypertension, significant acute or chronic bleeding, active malignant disease, haemolysis, haemoglobinopathies, folic acid deficiency, vitamin B12 de- ficiency, platelet count >500 × 109/L or <100 × 109/L, pure red cell aplasia, epileptic seizure during previous 6 months, congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Classifi- cation Class IV), myocardial infarction or stroke, severe or unstable coronary artery disease, severe liver disease at investigator’s discretion, during the previous 3 months, un- controlled hyperparathyroidism or symptomatic secondary hyperparathyroidism, pregnancy or lactation period, women of childbearing potential without effective contraception, participation in a clinical trial during the previous 3 months, known hypersensitivity to recombinant human erythropoi- etin, polyethylene glycol or to any constituent of the study medication, planned elective surgery during the study period, temporary (untunneled) dialysis access catheter, active serious infection and/or use of injectable antibiotics during the previous 8 weeks and known clinically significant hypercoagulability states. Written informed consent was provided from all pa- tients included in the study. The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. The study was approved by the Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and the Ministry of Health. After a 4-week screening period, during which mean Hb levels were maintained between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL on their current ESA treatment, eligible patients were con- verted to once-monthly i.v. CERA. Patients entered a 16- week CERA dose-titration period (DTP) followed by a 8-week efficacy evaluation period (EEP) and 4-week safety follow-up (Figure 1). Efficacy and safety parameters The primary efficacy parameter was the proportion of pa- tients in the per protocol (PP) population who maintained their mean Hb concentration within ±1.0 g/dL of their ref- erence Hb and between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL during the EEP. Secondary efficacy parameters were the percentage of patients whose Hb concentrations remained within the range of 10.0–12.0 g/dL throughout the EEP, the median time spent in the target Hb range of 10.0–12.0 g/dL during the EEP, the mean change in time-adjusted average Hb concentration between baseline and the EEP or DTP and the mean monthly and cumulative CERA dose to maintain target Hb level throughout the EEP. The safety parameters evaluated in the study included incidence of adverse events, changes and abnormalities in laboratory safety parameters and incidence of red blood cell transfusions during the CERA treatment phase. Study medication CERA (MIRCERA®, Roche, Istanbul, Turkey) was adminis- tered i.v. on Day 0 and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20. Starting dose of CERA was 120 µg when previous weekly epoetin <8000 IU or darbepoetin alpha <40 µg, 200 µg when pre- vious weekly epoetin 8–16 000 IU or darbepoetin alpha 40–80 µg and 360 µg when previous weekly epoetin >16 000 IU or darbepoetin alpha >80 µg. The dose of CERAwas adjusted to maintain the individual patient’s Hb within a range of ±1.0 g/dL of the reference Hb concentra- tion and between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL throughout the DTP and the EEP (Weeks l–24). Iron supplementation Patients were required to be iron replete to enter into this study and were required to maintain an adequate iron status throughout the study period. Patient iron status was monitored by assessing serum ferritin and TSAT. Initi- ation or intensification of iron supplementation was per- mitted in the case of iron deficiency during the study. Iron deficiency was defined as serum ferritin <100 ng/mL and TSAT <20% (or percentage of hypochromic red blood cells >10%). Iron supplementation was performed according to indi- vidual centre practice. To avoid iron toxicity, iron Fig. 1. Study design. ESA, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; DTP, dose-titration period; EEP, efficacy evaluation period. 2 N. Duman et al. D ow nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /ckj/article-abstract/7/5/464/317605 by H AC ETTEPE U N IVER SITY M ED IC AL C EN TER LIBR AR Y user on 28 O ctober 2019 supplementation was temporarily discontinued in patients with serum ferritin >800 ng/mL or TSAT >50% until serum ferritin decreased to <800 ng/mL and TSAT to <50%. Statistical analysis The sample size calculation was based on an initial esti- mate of 72% for patients maintaining Hb concentration within ±1.0 g/dL and a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI). The sample size of 200 patients was calculated for the study protocol before the first patient was screened. However, there were only 173 patients screened and 132 patients treated with CERA. With 132 patients, the power of the study is reduced to 65%. Patients who received at least one dose of CERA (Week 0) and for whom data for at least one follow-up variable were available were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) popu- lation. The safety population was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and underwent a safety follow-up, whether withdrawn prema- turely or not. The PP population was all patients in the safety population with the exception of patients with <3 re- corded Hb values during the EEP, patientsmissing an admin- istration of CERA during Weeks 16–24, patients withdrawn before the end of the EEP, patients with inadequate iron status defined as mean serum ferritin <100 ng/mL or mean TSAT ≤20% or mean hypochromic red blood cells ≥10% during EEP. For the primary endpoint, the reference Hb value was defined on the basis of all assessments at Weeks 4, 3, 2, 1 and 0. For Hb measurements H0,… , Hn taken at time point’s t0,… , tn, the time-adjusted average Hb value was calculated. Data missing at the end of the EEP was handled using the last observation carried forward method, including any data missing due to withdrawal of patients following red blood cell transfusion. Results Study population A total of 173 patients were screened for eligibility to par- ticipate in the trial. Of these, 33 failed screening, 6 refused treatment, did not cooperate or withdrew consent, and 2 experienced an adverse event. Thus, 132 were enrolled in the trial and entered the DTP (Figure 2). Thirty patients dis- continued the study treatment prematurely. Five patients withdrew from the study due to adverse events [ischaemic stroke, anaemia, renal transplantation, gastrointestinal haemorrhage (two patients)]. The mean age of 127 patients in the ITT population was 50.5 ± 13.9 years, and the most common aetiology for CKD was hypertension (34.4%). The mean baseline Hb level was 11.1 ± 0.6 g/dL. The mean Kt/V and urea reduc- tion ratio were 1.6 ± 0.4 and 68.1 ± 20.6, respectively, showing that dialysis was generally adequate (Table 1). There was no patient with Kt/V < 1.0. Among the safety population, the most commonly prescribed ESA prior to commencement of CERA was epoetin alpha followed by epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha. Efficacy results Thirty-nine patients [46.4% (95% CI: 35.5–57.7%)] in the PP population maintained a mean Hb concentration within ±1.0 g/dL of the reference Hb concentration and between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL during the EEP. This proportion of patients in the ITT population during the EEP was 34.7% (44 patients; 95% CI: 26.4–43.6%) (Figure 3). The percent- age of patients whose Hb concentrations remained within the range of 10.0–12.0 g/dL throughout the EEP was 51.2% (65 patients), with a 95% CI of 42.2–60.2%. Thirty-three patients maintained all individual Hb values between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL throughout the EEP. The median time spent in the target range of 10.0–12.0 g/dL was 38 days (mean: 33.1 ± 16.89 days) during the EEP and 62 days (mean: 60.4 ± 32.69 days) during the DTP. Figure 4 shows the mean Hb concentration during the DTP and EEP. The mean change in time-adjusted average Hb concentration was 0.29 ± 1.08 g/dL between baseline and the EEP, and 0.52 ± 0.90 g/dL between baseline and DTP (Figure 4). The successive change in Hb concentration was 0.46 ± 0.41 g/dL during the DTP and 0.45 ± 0.63 g/dL during the EEP. The mean CERA monthly dose was 121.6 ± 47.13 µg during the DTP and 112.4 ± 76.78 µg during the EEP Fig. 2. Study population. ITT, intent to treat; PP, per protocol. CERA for haemodialysis in chronic renal anaemia 3 D ow nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /ckj/article-abstract/7/5/464/317605 by H AC ETTEPE U N IVER SITY M ED IC AL C EN TER LIBR AR Y user on 28 O ctober 2019 (Table 2). The median monthly dose decreased from 120 µg during the DTP to 100 µg during the EEP. The mean cu- mulative total dose up to Week 20 was 703.2 ± 313.24 µg. The mean CERA dose of patients who maintained all indi- vidual Hb values between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL throughout the EEP was 103.5 ± 46.95 µg. The mean serum ferritin level was 675.7 ± 413.79 and 682.9 ± 447.08 µg/L, and TSAT was 34.8 ± 15.7 and 36.5 ± 17.6% at baseline and final evaluation, respectively. Safety results Forty-four patients (33.6%) reported a total of 73 adverse events during treatment with CERA, and 11 patients (8.4%) had 13 treatment-related adverse events (Table 3). The most affected body system classes were infections and in- festations (11% of all patients), gastrointestinal disorders (6%) and vascular disorders (5%). The most frequently oc- curring adverse events were hypertension (4%) and bron- chitis (2%). Thirteen patients (9.9%) reported 15 serious adverse events. Two serious adverse events (ischaemic stroke and vomiting) were considered related to treatment with CERA, 12 serious adverse events occurred during the DTP (one occurred twice in one individual during the DTP) and 3 serious adverse events occurred during the EEP. Table 1. Demographics and baseline data of study patients Result Age (years), mean ± SD 50.5 ± 13.9 Gender, n (%) Female 63 (49.6%) Male 64 (50.4%) Aetiology of CKD, n (%) Hypertension 45 (34.4%) Unknown 34 (26.0%) Diabetes 29 (22.1%) Glomerulonephritis 14 (10.7%) Interstitial nephritis/pyelonephritis 12 (9.2%) Others 20 (15.3%) Dosage of ESA before switch to CERA, mean ± SD (n) Darbepoetin alpha 40.7 ± 54.4 µg (n = 23) Epoetin alpha 6540 ± 5358 IU (n = 65) Epoetin beta 7698 ± 2932 IU (n = 43) Laboratory findings, n (%) Hb (g/dL) 11.1 ± 0.6 Haematocrit (fraction) 0.33 ± 0.02 Erythrocyte MCV (fL) 90.5 ± 6.14 White blood cell number (109/L) 6.7 ± 1.7 Platelet number (109/L) 214.2 ± 67.1 Serum ferritin (µg/L) 675.7 ± 413.8 TSAT (g/L) 34.8 ± 15.7 Iron concentration (µmol/L) 12.4 ± 4.7 Total iron-binding capacity (µmol/L) 34.8 ± 11.4 TSAT (%) 34.8 ± 15.7 Albumin (g/L) 39.9 ± 4.8 Creatinine (µmol/L) 712.7 ± 232.31 C-reactive protein (mg/L) 11.4 ± 27.1 Phosphate (mmol/L) 1.5 ± 0.5 Potassium (mmol/L) 5.1 ± 0.9 Kt/V 1.6 ± 0.4 Urea reduction ratio 68.1 ± 20.6 Fig. 3. Percentage of patients with a mean Hb concentration within ±1.0 g/dL of the reference Hb concentration and between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL. Fig. 4. Mean Hb concentration of patients over time. Table 2. Dosage of CERA CERA dose (μg/month), mean ± SD (median) Result DTP 121.6 ± 47.13 (120.0) EEP 112.4 ± 76.78 (100.0) Cumulative CERA dose (μg), mean ± SD (median) Baseline 144.0 ± 38.7 (120.0) Week 24 703.2 ± 313.24 (695.0) Dose adjustment requirement, n (%) DTP Total 96 (75.6%) Dose decreased 38 (29.9%) Dose increased 18 (14.2%) Dose decreased + increased 40 (31.5%) EEP Total 39 (36.4%) Dose decreased 23 (21.5%) Dose increased 16 (15.0%) Table 3. Summary of adverse events in the safety population (n = 131) Patients (%) Any adverse event 44 (33.6%) Serious adverse events 13 (9.9%) Adverse events leading to withdrawal 5 (3.8%) Treatment-related adverse events 11a (8.4%) Treatment-related serious adverse events 2b (1.5%) Withdrawals 29 (22.1%) Deaths 0 (0.0%) aSteal syndrome, hypertension (four patients), arteriovenous fistula occlusion (two patients), leucopoenia, rhinitis, thrombocytopenia and white blood cell count decreased. bIschaemic stroke, vomiting. 4 N. Duman et al. D ow nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /ckj/article-abstract/7/5/464/317605 by H AC ETTEPE U N IVER SITY M ED IC AL C EN TER LIBR AR Y user on 28 O ctober 2019 Discussion This single-arm, open-label study demonstrates that stable Hb concentrations can be maintained in CKD pa- tients on haemodialysis after switching from shorter- acting ESAs to once-monthly CERA. CERA was created by integrating a large methoxy poly- ethylene glycol polymer chain into the erythropoietin molecule [8]. CERA has distinct binding properties at the erythropoietin receptor and a long half-life of ∼130 h, which allow administration of CERA at extended intervals (once-monthly) [12]. Extended dosing intervals may result in a more convenient and manageable schedule of administration than the more frequent dosing options available for currently available epoetin treatments [12]. Less frequent dosing regimens may also be associated with smoother control of Hb concentrations [14]. In the present study, the starting dose of CERA was 120–360 µg based on the dose of ESA, which is the start- ing dose preferred in the previous studies. In a study by Dellanna et al. [20], CERA starting dose was 125–200 µg in haemodialysis patients converting from short-acting ESAs to once-monthly CERA. Minutolo et al. [21, 22], however, reported that lower doses of CERA (75–100 µg/month) maintains Hb levels in non-dialysis CKD disease. Since we preferred standard initial dose of CERA, we cannot comment on the efficacy of lower conversion dose CERA. The dose of CERA was adjusted to maintain Hb levels within a range of ±1.0 g/dL of the reference Hb concentra- tion and between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL. Similar to our study, in the STRIATA study, CERA doses were adjusted to main- tain Hb levels within ±1.0 g/dL of baseline and between 10.0 and 13.5 g/dL [23]. Primary and secondary endpoints of the present study were also in agreement with previous studies such as Hb levels within 1 g/dL of the baseline Hb value [16, 17, 24], Hb levels within a target range [17] and mean change in Hb level between baseline and evaluation period [16, 17]. The results of this study show similarities with previous- ly published studies demonstrating that CERA once- monthly provides maintenance of stable Hb levels within target range in CKD patients with chronic renal anaemia [16–18, 25]. Sulowicz et al. [17] and Levin et al. [16] re- ported that 66.1 and 68% of renal anaemia patients on dialysis treated with CERA once-monthly maintained Hb values within ±1 g/dL from baseline during the evaluation period. In a similar patient population, Carrera et al. [18] found that 64.1% of patients maintained average Hb levels ≥10.5 g/dL which did not decrease by >1 g/dL from baseline values, whereas this proportion was 40.1% in pa- tients treated with once-monthly darbepoetin alfa. In a study with very similar study design and patient popula- tion to ours, Fliser et al. [25] reported 30.8 and 74.9% of patients achieved Hb levels within 11–12.5 and 10–13 g/ dL during an 8-week evaluation period, with 82.9% of pa- tients maintaining Hb concentration within ±1.0 g/dL of their mean Hb concentration. Results from these studies cannot be directly compared with results from our study, as the definition of Hb stability in our study was different; we found that 46.4% of patients in the PP population maintained their mean Hb concentration within ±1.0 g/dL of their reference Hb value and between 10.0 and 12.0 g/ dL during the EEP and that 51.2% of patients in the ITT population maintained a mean Hb concentration between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL throughout the EEP. In spite of some differences in study design and the definition of Hb stability of our study from those of previous studies, our findings supported the reports in literature that CERA once-monthly is effective in maintaining stable Hb levels within target range in CKD patients with chronic renal anaemia. The mean change in time-adjusted average Hb concen- tration between baseline and the EEP in the ITT population was 0.29±1.08 g/dL. Sulowicz et al. [17] found that the mean change in Hb from baseline to the evaluation period was lower (0.131 g/dL) for once-monthly CERA. Hb values remained stable throughout the evaluation phase in our study population. Similarly, in the previous clinical studies, CERA was shown to have comparable effi- cacy and safety profile to existing conventional ESAs or darbepoetin alfa in both dialysis and non-dialysis patients [13, 15, 17, 21, 25]. For example, In STRIATA study, i.v. CERA once every 2 weeks was found clinically non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa in maintaining Hb levels in patients on dialysis [23]. The PROTOS study, a randomized Phase III study in 572 patients, showed that s.c. CERA once or twice monthly successfully maintained stable Hb levels in pa- tients who were on dialysis and randomly converted dir- ectly from epoetin [17]. The MIRACEL study showed that conversion from epoetin or darbepoetin to monthly CERA administration was practical, convenient and offer good control of Hb levels, regardless of the previous type of therapy or dosing frequency in over 400 haemodialysis pa- tients [25]. The ARCTOS study showed that CERA once every 2 weeks was as effective as darbepoetin alfa once weekly for correcting anaemia in 324 ESA-naïve patients with CKD not on dialysis [13]. Minutolo et al. [21] also re- ported that conversion of darbepoetin to CERA maintains Hb levels in non-dialysis CKD patients. In a randomized controlled study, Roger et al. [15] compared monthly CERA and darbepoetin alfa once weekly or every 2 weeks in 307 non-dialysis CKD patients and reported that CERA success- fully corrects anaemia and maintains stable Hb levels in non-dialysis CKD patients. CERA administered s.c. was also reported to be a good alternative for treating chronic anaemia in patients with CKD and intolerance to epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha (single case report) [26]. The results from clinical studies showed comparable safety profile of CERA with conventional ESAs. In a pooled analysis in patients with CKD (n = 1789), CERA showed a safety profile comparable with that of other ESAs [27]. The present study also confirmed the good safety and toler- ability profile of CERA. Less than 10% of patients reported treatment-related adverse events. One of the limitations of this study was the low number of patients who completed the study according to protocol (84 patients). Another limitation was that iron supplemen- tation was left to the discretion of the individual study centres. Inflammation and oxidative stress can limit or prevent the uptake of oral iron in the intestine [28]. Since CKD patients on dialysis often present with high levels of inflammation and oxidative stress [29], they are often limited in their ability to oral iron uptake. Thus, in centres where oral rather than i.v. iron was given to correct for iron deficiency, the patients’ responses to CERA may have been limited by iron levels too low for efficient erythropoi- esis. In spite of these limitations, the present study is the first study evaluating CERA treatment in patients with chronic renal anaemia undergoing haemodialysis in Turkey. As a conclusion, the results of this study confirm that once-monthly CERA treatment maintains stable Hb con- centrations with a good safety and tolerability profile in CERA for haemodialysis in chronic renal anaemia 5 D ow nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /ckj/article-abstract/7/5/464/317605 by H AC ETTEPE U N IVER SITY M ED IC AL C EN TER LIBR AR Y user on 28 O ctober 2019 patients with chronic renal anaemia undergoing haemo- dialysis. Funding. This study was supported by Roche, Turkey. Conflict of interest statement. Co-authors, Ertuğrul Akbaş and Fatih Özdener are currently staff members of Roche, Istanbul; manufacturer of study drug (MIRCERA®). Other co-authors had no conflict of interest to declare. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part. References 1. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical practice guidelines for anemia of chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37: 182–238 2. Fink J, Blahut S, Reddy M et al. Use of erythropoietin before the initiation of dialysis and its impact on mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37: 348–355 3. European best practice guidelines for the management of anemia in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 1–50 4. Eckardt KU. Pathophysiology of renal anemia. Clin Nephrol 2000; 53: 2–8 5. Tong EM, Nissenson AR. Erythropoietin and anemia. Semin Nephrol 2001; 21: 190–203 6. Halstenson CE, Macres M, Katz SA et al. Comparative pharma- cokinetics and pharmacodynamics of epoetin alpha and epoetin beta. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50: 702–712 7. Nissenson AR. Novel erythropoiesis stimulating protein for managing the anemia of chronic kidney disease. Am J Kid Dis 2001; 38: 1390–1397 8. Macdougall IC. CERA (continuous erythropoietin receptor acti- vator): a new erythropoiesis-stimulating agent for the treat- ment of anemia. Curr Hematol Rep 2005; 4: 436–440 9. Macdougall IC. Novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: a new era in anemia management. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 200–207 10. Panchapakesan U, Sumual S, Pollock C. Nanomedicines in the treatment of anemia in renal disease: focus on CERA (con- tinuous erythropoietin receptor activator). Int J Nanomed 2007; 2: 33–38 11. Veng-Pedersen P, Freise KJ, Schmidt RL et al. Pharmacokinetic differentiation of drug candidates using system analysis and physiological-based modelling. Comparison of C.E.R.A. and erythropoietin. J Pharm Pharmacol 2008; 60: 1321–1334 12. Macdougall IC, Robson R, Opatrna S et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous and subcutaneous continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) in pa- tients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1: 1211–1215 13. Macdougall IC, Walker R, Provenzano R et al. C.E.R.A. corrects anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialy- sis: results of a randomized clinical trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 337–347 14. Klinger M, Arias M, Vargemezis V et al. Efficacy of intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta administered every 2 weeks compared with epoetin administered 3 times weekly in patients treated by hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis: a randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 50: 989–1000 15. Roger SD, Locatelli F, Woitas RP et al. C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks corrects anemia and maintains hemoglobin in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26: 3980–3986 16. Levin NW, Fishbane S, Cañedo FV et al. Intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta for hemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis: a randomised non-inferiority trial (MAXIMA). Lancet 2007; 370: 1415–1421 17. Sulowicz W, Locatelli F, Ryckelynck JP et al. Once-monthly subcutaneous C.E.R.A. maintains stable hemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis and con- verted directly from epoetin one to three times weekly. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 637–646 18. Carrera F, Lok CE, de Francisco A et al. Maintenance treatment of renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa ad- ministered monthly: a randomized comparative trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 4009–4017 19. Kessler M, Martínez-Castelao A, Siamopoulos KC et al. C.E.R.A. once every 4 weeks in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: the ARCTOS extension study. Hemodial Int 2010; 14: 233–239 20. Dellanna F, Winkler RE, Bozkurt F et al. Dosing strategies for conversion of haemodialysis patients from short-acting erythropoiesis stimulating agents to once-monthly C.E.R.A.: experience from the MIRACEL study. Int J Clin Pract 2011; 65: 64–72 21. Minutolo R, Zamboli P, Chiodini P et al. Conversion of darbe- poetin to low doses of CERA maintains hemoglobin levels in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Blood Purif 2010; 30: 186–194 22. Minutolo R, Conte G, Cozzolino M et al. Conversion from epoetin and darbepoetin to C.E.R.A. in non-dialysis CKD pa- tients: a multicenter Italian prospective study in nephrology practice. Blood Purif 2013; 36: 69–77 23. Canaud B, Mingardi G, Braun J et al. Intravenous C.E.R.A. maintains stable hemoglobin levels in patients on dialysis previously treated with darbepoetin alfa: results from STRIATA, a randomized phase III study. Nephrol Dial Trans- plant 2008; 23: 3654–3661 24. Spinowitz B, Coyne DW, Lok CE et al. C.E.R.A. maintains stable control of hemoglobin in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis when administered once every two weeks. Am J Nephrol 2008; 28: 280–289 25. Fliser D, Kleophas W, Dellanna F et al. Evaluation of mainten- ance of stable hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients converting from epoetin or darbepoetin to monthly intraven- ous C.E.R.A.: the MIRACEL study. Curr Med Res Opin 2010; 26: 1083–1089 26. Davila Fajardo CL, Pena Ortega M, Cabeza Barrera J et al. Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (Mircera) in the treatment of a patient with chronic kidney disease presenting late-onset hypersensitivity to other epoetins. Nefrologia 2010; 30: 372–373 27. Locatelli F, Mann JF, Aldigier JC et al. C.E.R.A.: safety profile: a pooled analysis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Nephrol 2010; 73: 94–103 28. Munoz M, Villar I, Garcia-Erce JA. An update on iron physi- ology.World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 4617–4626 29. Vaziri ND, Zhou XT. Potential mechanisms of adverse outcomes in trials of anemia correction with erythropoietin in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 1082–1088 Received for publication: 22.3.14; Accepted in revised form: 3.7.14 6 N. Duman et al. D ow nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /ckj/article-abstract/7/5/464/317605 by H AC ETTEPE U N IVER SITY M ED IC AL C EN TER LIBR AR Y user on 28 O ctober 2019 << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /PageByPage /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile () /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Warning /CompatibilityLevel 1.5 /CompressObjects /Off /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages false /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.1000 /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 524288 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo false /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings false /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Preserve /UCRandBGInfo /Remove /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true /Courier /Courier-Bold /Courier-BoldOblique /Courier-Oblique /Helvetica /Helvetica-Bold /Helvetica-BoldOblique /Helvetica-Oblique /Symbol /Times-Bold /Times-BoldItalic /Times-Italic /Times-Roman /ZapfDingbats ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 150 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 175 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50286 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages false /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG2000 /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 20 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 15 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 175 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50286 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages false /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG2000 /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 20 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 15 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages true /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 175 /MonoImageDepth 4 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50286 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects true /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ENU () >> >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [600 600] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice