Özet
This dissertation aims at investigating thematic and discursive construction of homosexuality through texts published in Kaos GL Magazine, the first and longest-standing alternative gay and lesbian publication in Turkey. More specifically, the research is an attempt to unearth two discursive-linguistic aspects of texts: (1) thematic distribution and thematic relation patterns of the texts; (2) discursive strategies and linguistic means and forms of realisation on which the construction of homosexual movement is based. To this end, 6 texts in the first five-year of the magazine (between the years 1994 and 1999) were purposively selected at the end of a preliminary inventory research, and included into grounded thematic analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). In the former analytical procedure, based on Grounded Theory (Glaser and Strauss, 1967; Corbin and Strauss, 2008), a systematic coding process was carried out, eventually finding out two most frequent thematic categories which describe the social order and the way homosexuals positioned themselves in the specific period of time. Textual segments pertaining to the categories obtained through the coding process were finally included into CDA. This analysis was based on the framework of the Discourse-Historical Approach, a well-established tradition in CDA studies. In accordance with this model and an added ‘insider’ perspective (Wodak, 2011), textual segments were diachronically analysed to find out the ways the social actors are represented (van Leeuwen, 1996 & Wodak et al., 2000). The findings of grounded thematic analysis show that, within five years, homosexuals’ description of the social order was mostly and consistently based on the themes heterosexism and homophobia while a strong emphasis on constructing a collective and unifying action was observed in the second half of the period as a way of self-description. In a parallel sense CDA findings demonstrate that, in the context of the socio-historical background of the period, homosexuals construct a counter negative-othering discourse to describe the society in the early texts of the period while a positive-self presentation comes to the forefront towards the end of the period based on the goal of forming group solidarity. The study is significant for revealing that it is not always the marginalised groups that are negatively presented in dominant discourses but also marginalised in-groups can identify themselves with out-groups by making use of similar negative-other presentation strategies. In this sense this study has implications for researchers, particularly in the field of Queer Linguistics, who aim at investigating in-group discourses. Also, the findings of the study can serve as a basis for further research on the construction of homosexuality not only through texts but also other discursive practices.
Keywords
Critical Discourse Analysis, Queer Linguistics, social constructivism, homosexual movement, group identity, Kaos GL Magazine
Künye
Adam, B. (2001) ‘Globalization and the mobilization of gay and lesbian communities’. In P. Hamel, H. Lustiger-Thaler, J. Nederveen Pieterse and S. Roseneil (Eds.) Globalization and social movements, (pp. 166–79). New York: St Martin’s/Palgrave.
Altıparmak, K. (2016). Türkiye’de cinsel kimliğin tanınması ve ayrımcılık. In M. Köylü (Ed.). Türkiye’de LGBTİ haklarının durumu ve öneriler. (pp. 45-51). Ankara: Kaos GL Derneği.
Antony, L. (1998) ‘Human nature’ and its role in feminist theory. In Philosophy in a feminist voice, J. Kourany (Ed.). New Haven: Princeton University Press.
Baird, V. (2007). No non-sense guide to sexual diversity. Oxford: New Internationalist Publication.
Baker, P. (2005). Public discourses of gay men. London: Routledge.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barrett, R. (2006). Queer talk. In E. K. Brown (Ed.). Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. (Second Edition), Vol IV. (pp. 316-23). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Başaran, Y. T. (1998, March). Homofobinin diğer yüzü. Kaos GL, 43, 16-18.
Başaran, Y. (2003). Türkiye’de eşcinsel kurtuluş hareketini yaratırken. Lezbiyen ve geylerin sorunları ve toplumsal barış için çözüm arayışları, Kaos GL Sempozyumu 23-24 Mayıs 2003 (pp. 38-46). Ankara: Kaos GL.
Baxter, J. (2010). Discourse-analytic approaches to text and talk. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.) Research methods in linguistics (pp. 117-137). London & New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Bayramoğlu, Y. (2011). Stonewall’dan Onur Yürüyüşüne. Cogito: Cinsel Yönelimler ve Queer Kuram, 65-66, 387-394.
Beaugrande, R. de (1980). Text, discourse and process: Toward a multidisciplinary science of texts. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Bereket, T. & Adam, B. D. (2006). The emergence of gay identities in contemporary Turkey. Sexualities, 9(2), 131–151.
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1989). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books Doubleday.
Binark, M. (2016). Geleneksel medya ve yeni medya ortamlarında “milli iradenin ve istikrarın” yaratılması: Dilsizleştirilmeler ve suskunluklar. In M. Köylü (Ed.) Türkiye’de LGBTİ haklarının durumu ve öneriler. (pp. 29-35). Ankara: Kaos GL Derneği.
Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Briscoe, F. M. & De Oliver, M. (2012). School leaders’ discursive constructions of low income and minority families identities: A market place racism/classism. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 9, 247–280.
Browne, K. (2006). Queer Theory/Queer Geographies. In E. K. Brown (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. (Second Edition) Vol IV (pp. 39-45). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Brubaker, R. & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “Identity”. In Theory and Society, 29:1-47.
Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2006). Gender, sexuality and gender. In E. K. Brown (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. (Second Edition). Vol IV (pp. 756-758). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Buechler, S. M. (2013). New social movements and new social movement theory. In D. A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandermans & D. McAdam (Eds.) The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Social and Political Movements (pp. 420-426). Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbespm143.
Burns, T. R. (2011). Towards a theory of structural discrimination: Cultural, institutional and interactional mechanisms of the ‘European dilemma’. In G. Delanty, R. Wodak, & P. Jones (Eds.), Identity, belonging and migration (pp. 152-172). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.
Burton, N. (2015). When homosexuality stopped being a mental disorder. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hide-and-seek/201509/when- homosexuality-stopped-being-mental-disorder
Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York and London: Routledge.
Büyükkantarcıoğlu, N. (2006). Toplumsal gerçeklik ve dil. İstanbul: Multilingual Yayınları.
Cameron, D. & Kulick, D. (2003). Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Canakis, C. (2015). The desire for identity and the identity of desire: Language, gender and sexuality in the Greek context. Gender & Language 9(1), 59-81.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Chesebro, James W. and Klenk, K. L. (1981). Gay masculinity in the gay disco. In J. W. Chesebro (Ed.), Gayspeak: Gay male and lesbian communication (pp. 87-103). New York: Pilgrim Press.
Classification system in Nazi concentration camps. (n.d.). In Holocaust Encyclopaedia. Retrieved from https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005378.
Coates, J. (2013). The discursive production of everyday heterosexualities. Discourse & Society 24(5), 536–552.
Cole, M. and Scribner, S. (1978). Introduction. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Suberman (Eds.), L. S. Vygotsky: mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 1-14). Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 13(1), 3-21.
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research 3e: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi and Singapore: Sage Publications.
Cory, D. W. (1951). The homosexual in America: A subjective approach. New York: Greenberg.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crist, S. (1997). Duration of onset consonants in gay male stereotyped speech. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(3), pp. 53–70.
Çetin, Z. (2015). Türkiye'de queer hareketinin dinamiği. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from https://tr.boell.org/tr/2015/11/04/tuerk_yede-queer-hareket_n_n-d_nam_g_
de Oliveira, J. M., Costa, C. G. & Nogueira, C. (2013). The workings of homonormativity: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer discourses on discrimination and public displays of affections in Portugal, Journal of Homosexuality, 60(10), 1475-1493.
Diltemiz Mol, M. (2016). LGBTİ hareketinin hak ve temsil mücadelesi ve siyasal iletişim faaliyetleri (Unpublished MA dissertation). Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Engin, C. (2015). LGBT in Turkey: Policies and experiences. Social Sciences, 4, 838-858.
Engindeniz, İ. (2012). L'emergence d'un 'espace public LGBT en Turquie: une analyse de la revue Kaos GL (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Univ. Grenoble Alpes, France.
Erol, A. (2011). Eşcinsel kurtuluş hareketinin Türkiye seyri. Cogito, 65-66, 431-464.
Erol, A. (2012). Gey her zaman yoktu. Her zaman olan eşcinsellikti! Retrieved from: http://kaosgl.org/sayfa.php?id=2008
Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, Volume 2 (pp. 258-284). London: Sage.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Flam, H. (2011). On institutional and agentic discrimination: Migrants and national labour markets. In G. Delanty, R. Wodak, & P. Jones (Eds.), Identity, belonging and migration (pp. 172-197). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Fone, B. R. (2000). Homophobia: A history. New York: Metropolitan.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality - Vol 1: An introduction. (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1976)
Foucault, M. (1989). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. C. Gordon (Ed.). (C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, K. Sopher, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1972)
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality - Vol 2: The use of pleasure. (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1984)
Foucault, M. (2002). The archaeology of knowledge. (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). London and New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1969)
Gatens, M. (1996). Imaginary bodies. London: Routledge.
Gaudio, R. (1994). Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech, 69(1), 30-57.
Ghaziani, A. (2011). Post-gay collective identity construction. Social Problems, 58(1), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2011.58.1.99
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. California: The Sociology Press.
Göregenli, M. (2016). Cinsel kimliklerin kontrolü açısından muhafazakarlık. In M. Köylü (Ed.). Türkiye’de LGBTİ haklarının durumu ve öneriler. (pp. 11-16). Ankara: Kaos GL Derneği.
Greenberg, D. F. (1988). The construction of homosexuality. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago.
Gross, L. (2001). Up from invisibility: Lesbians, gay men, and the media in America. Columbia University Press, 94.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Güneş (2015). Türkiye’de LGBTİ hareketinin mücadele tarihi. Retrieved February 25, 2019 from http://s_yas_haber3.org/_lk-eylemden-bugune-lgbt_-hareket_
Güneş, A. (2016). Göğe kuşak lazım. İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
Güneş. A. (n.d.). İlk günden bugüne LGBTİ hareketi. Retrieved February 25, 2019 from http://platform24.org/objective/365/ilk-eylemden-bugune-lgbti-hareketi
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Hekma, G., Oosterhuis, H. & Steakley, J. (1995) Leftist sexual politics and homosexuality: A historical overview, Journal of Homosexuality, 29(2-3), 1-40.
Herek, G. (1990). Homophobia. In Wayne R. Dynes and William A. Percy (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of Homosexuality (pp. 551-552). New York: Garland Publishing.
Heterosexism. (n.d.). In Collins English Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/heterosexism
Howard-Payne, L. (2016). Glaser or Strauss? Considerations for selecting a grounded theory study. South African Journal of Psychology, Vol. 46(1), 50-62.
İlaslaner, S. (2014). Türkiye’de LGBT hareketi: Daha geniş bir evrene doğru soybilim, özgünlük ve gömülmüşlük, Türkiye Politika ve Araştırma Merkezi (AnalizTürkiye), 3(4), 25-44. Retrieved from http://researchturkey.org/?p=5899&lang=tr
ILGA (2009). A brief history of LGBT movement in Turkey, Retrieved from https://ilga.org/a-brief-history-of-the-lgbt-movement-in-turkey
İnce, E. (2014). LGBTİ: kaldırımın altından gökkuşağı çıkıyor. Retrieved August 21, 2017, from https://b_anet.org/b_anet/pr_nt/160544-lgbt_-kald_r_m_n-alt_ndan-gokkusag_-c_k_yor
Jung, P. B. & Smith, R. F. (1993). Heterosexism: An ethical challenge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kantor, M. (2009). Homophobia: The state of sexual bigotry today (2nd edition). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Kaos gey ve lezbiyen kültür araştırmalar ve dayanışma derneği çalışma alanları. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.kaosgldernegi.org/belge.php?id=calisma
Kaos GL Dergisi. (2011). Retrieved May 5, 2018, from http://www.kaosgldergi.com/dergi.php
Kaos GL Meydanlardaydı!. (1996, March). Kaos GL, 19, 1.
Kaos GL’den: “Başka”larının acısına “bakmak”. (2009, March-April). Kaos GL, 105, 1.
Koller, V. (2009). Analysing collective identity in discourse: social actors and contexts. Semen 27, Received on January 04, 2019 from http://journals.openedition.org/semen/8877
Koller, V. (2013). Constructing (non-)normative identities in written lesbian discourse: A diachronic study. Discourse & Society, 24(5), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486166
Krinsky, C. (2000). Homophobia. In George E. Haggerty (Ed.) Gay Histories and Cultures: An Encyclopaedia (pp. 692-694). New York: Garland Publishing.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2007). Multiple/collective identities, migration and belonging: Voices of migrants, In C. Caldas-Coulthard and R. Iedema (Eds.). Identity Trouble (pp. 95–119). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kuhar, R. (2003). Media representations of homosexuality: An analysis of the print media in Slovenia, 1970-2000. Ljubljana: Peace Institute.
Kural, K. C. (2012). Toplumsal olarak dezavantajlı grupların karşı hegemonik pratikleri: cinsel azınlıklar örneği (Unpublished MA dissertation). Atılım University, Ankara.
Leap, W. L. (1996). Word's out: Gay men's English. Minneapolis and London: University Minnesota Press.
Legman G. (1941). The language of homosexuality: An American glossary, In G. W. Henry (Ed.). Sex variants: a study of homosexual patters, Vol. 2. (pp. 1149-1179). New York and London: Hoeber.
Lewis, B. (2017, August). Gay liberation: The rocky road to sexual equality. BBC History, Issue 6, 69-77.
Lin, A. (2014). Critical discourse analysis in applied linguistics: A methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 213-232.
Livia, A. & Hall, K. (Eds.). (1997). Queerly phrased: language, gender, and sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Locke, K. (1996). Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years? Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 239–245
Lutes, M. A. (2000). Turkey. In George E. Haggerty (Ed.) Gay Histories and Cultures: An Encyclopaedia (pp. 1385-86). New York: Garland Publishing.
Margulies, R. (2004). İkincil değil, temel bir talep: Cinsel baskıdan arınmış bir dünya. In V. Baird, Cinsel çeşitlilik: yönelimler, politikalar, haklar ve ihlaller. (H. Doğan, Trans.) (pp. 7-10). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
MAXQDA. (2018). MAXQDA 18 online manual. Retrieved from https://www.maxqda.com/help-max18/
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Available from https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173)
Merhaba!. (1996, October). Kaos GL, 26, 1.
Meyer, (2001). Between theory, method and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA, R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 14-31). London: Sage.
Mills, S. (2004). Discourse. London: Routledge.
Mongie, L. D. (2016). Critical discourse analysis as queer linguistics: Religious pro- and anti-LGBT equality framing and counterframing in two letters to the editor in the City Press. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 49, 23-43, doi:10.5842/49-0-664.
Moonwomon, B. (1997). Towards the study of lesbian speech. In A. Livia and K. Hall (Eds.), Queerly phrased: language, gender, and sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Motschenbacher, H. (2011). Taking queer linguistics further: sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 212, 149–179.
Motschenbacher, H. (2012). ‘I think Houston wants a kiss right?’: Linguistic constructions of heterosexualities at Eurovision Song Contest press conferences.” Journal of Language and Sexuality, 1(2), 127-150.
Motschenbacher, H. (2013). ‘Now everybody can wear a skirt’: Linguistic constructions of non-heteronormativity at Eurovision Song Contest press conferences. Discourse & Society, 24(5), 590–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486167
Motschenbacher, H. & Stegu, M. (2013). Queer linguistic approaches to discourse: Introduction. Discourse and Society, 24(5), 519-535.
Öner, A. (2015). Beyaz yakalı eşcinseller. İşyerinde cinsel yönelim ayrımcılığı ve mücadele stratejileri. İstanbul: İletişim.
Oswald, R. F., Blume, L. B., & Marks, S. R. (2005). Decentering heteronormativity: A model for family studies. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory & research (pp. 143-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Öz, Y. (2011). LGBT bireyler açısından mevzuat taraması. Ankara: Kaos GL.
Özbay, C. (2015). Same-sex sexualities in Turkey. In J. Wright (Ed.) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 2nd edition (pp. 870-874). Oxford: Elsevier.
Özbek, Ç. (2017). Ayrımcılıkla mücadelenin kamusallığı: LGBT, hareket ve örgütlülük. Toplum ve Demokrasi, 11(24), 141-165.
Özetle: Lambdaistanbul Ne Yaptı?. (n.d.). Retrieved July 25, 2017, from http://www.lambdaistanbul.org/s/hakkinda/ozetle-lambdaistanbul-ne-yapti/
Özkan, T. (2004). Türkiye’de eşcinsellik ve KAOS GL grubu (Unpublished MA dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
Partog, E. (2012). Queer teori bağlamında Türkiye LGBTT mücadelesinin siyasi çizgisi. In C. Çakırlar and S. Delice (Eds.) Cinsellik muamması: Türkiye’de queer kültür ve muhalefet (pp. 162- 184). İstanbul: Metis.
Pickett, B. (2009). Historical dictionary of homosexuality. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub. Group.
Prokhovnik, R. (1999). Rational Woman. London: Routledge.
Que, H. & Shane, S. (2000). Sexual orientation. In George E. Haggerty (Ed.) Gay Histories and Cultures: An Encyclopaedia (pp. 1225-1237). New York: Garland Publishing.
Queen, R. (1998). ‘‘Stay queer! Never fear!’’: building queer social networks. World Englishes 17(2), 203–214.
Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.
Rodgers, B. (1972). The Queen’s vernacular: a gay lexicon, London: Blond & Briggs.
Schneider, B. (2013). Heteronormativity and queerness in transnational heterosexual Salsa communities. Discourse & Society, 24(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486071
Smart, B. (2002). Michel Foucault: Revised Edition. London and New York: Routledge.
Sonenschein, D. (1969). The homosexual's language. Journal of Sex Research, 5(4), 281-291.
Stanley, J. (1970). Homosexual slang. American Speech, 45(1-2), 45-59.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tarihçe. (2011). Retrieved July 25, 2017, from http://www.kaosgldernegi.org/belge.php?id=tarihce
Tin, L.-G. (2008). Heterosexism. In A. Michaud, L.-G. Tin, M. Redburn & K. Mathers, (Eds.). The dictionary of homophobia: A global history of gay & lesbian experience. (M. Redburn, Trans.) Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
Türkiye’de eşcinsel yaşam. (n.d.). Retrieved October 1, 2018, from https://www.turkeygay.net/turkce/turkeygay.html
van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism in media. London and New York: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001a). Multidisciplinary CDA: A please for diversity, R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95-120). London: Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001b). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4, 249-283.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001c). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context. A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2009b). Social cognition, social power and social discourse. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 8(1-2), 129-157. Retrieved 20 Nov. 2018, from doi:10.1515/text.1.1988.8.1-2.129
van Dijk. T. A. (2009a). Society and discourse. How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
van Gulik, R. H. (1961). Sexual life in ancient China. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
van Leeuven, T. (2005). Three models of interdisciplinarity. In R. Wodak and P. Chilton (Eds.) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. (pp. 3-18). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.). Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32-70). London: Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge and Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Waltz, M. (2005). Alternative and activist media, Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Weeks, J. (2007). Foreword. In Vanessa Baird, No non-sense guide to sexual diversity. (pp. 5-6) [Foreword]. Oxford: New Internationalist Publication.
Weeks, J. (2012). Sex, politics and society: The regulation of sexuality since 1800 (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
Werlich, E. (1976). A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.
Werstch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge and Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991) Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
What is MAXQDA?. (2018). Maxqda. Retrieved on July 28, 2018 from https://www.maxqda.com/what-is-maxqda
Williams, Craig A. (2010). Roman homosexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2004) Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Wodak, R. (2001a). What CDA is about - a summary about its history, important concepts and its developments. In Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis. (pp. 1-13). London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Wodak, R. (2001b). The discourse-historical approach. In Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis. (pp. 63-93). London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Wodak, R. (2004). National and transnational identities: European and other identities constructed in interviews with EU officials. In R. K. Herrmann, T. Risse & M. B. Brewer (Eds.). Transnational identities: Becoming European in the EU. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Wodak, R. (2009). The semiotics of racism: A critical discourse-historical analysis. In Jan Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 311-326). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wodak, R. (2011). ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion and exclusion – Discrimination via discourse. In G. Delanty, R. Wodak, & P. Jones (Eds.), Identity, belonging and migration (pp. 54-77). Liverpool University Press. doi:10.5949/UPO9781846314537.004
Wodak, R., De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. & Liebhart, K. (2000). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Yıldız, D. (2007, March-April). Türkiye tarihinde eşcinselliğin izinde: Eşcinsellik hareketinin tarihinden satır başları -2: 90’lar. Kaos GL, 93, 46-49.
Yılmaz, V. & Demirbaş, H. B. (2015). Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi’nde lezbiyen, gey, biseksüel ve trans (LGBT) hakları gündeminin ortaya çıkışı ve gelişimi: 2008-2014. Alternatif Politika, 7(2), 230-256.
Zimmerman, B. & Haggerty, G. E. (2000). Introduction. In G. E. Haggerty (Ed.), Gay Histories and Cultures. (pp. x-xviii). New York and London: Garland Publishing.
TEXTS OF ANALYSIS FROM KAOS GL MAGAZINE
Başaran, Y. T. (1996, May). Nasıl bir eşcinsel hareket tartışmasına çağrı. Kaos GL, 21, 15-16.
Başaran, Y. T. (1998, March). Homofobinin diğer yüzü. Kaos GL, 43, 16-18.
Evren, B. (1996, August). Tartışma: Nasıl bir eşcinsel hareket. Kaos GL, 24, 9-10.
Kaos şanlıyor. (1994, September). Kaos GL, 1, 1-2.
Özapl, Y. (1996, August). Tartışma: Nasıl bir eşcinsel hareket. Kaos GL, 24, 9.
Şakir. (1999, April). Kitleselleşelim mi, kurumsallaşalım mı?. Kaos GL, 56, 8-9.
Var olan durum ve eşcinsellik. (1994, September). Kaos GL, 1, 3-4.
