Basit öğe kaydını göster

An Analysis of The Optimal Design Of Feed-In Tariff Policy For Photovoltaic Investments in Turkey

dc.contributor.advisorTeoman, Özgür
dc.contributor.advisorAra-Aksoy, Shihomi
dc.contributor.authorKural, Duygu
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-02T08:20:29Z
dc.date.available2018-10-02T08:20:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-05-23
dc.identifier.citationAdamowicz, W., Louviere, J., & Swait, J. (1998). Introduction to attribute-based stated choice methods. NOAA-National Oceanic Athmospheric Administration, Washington, USA. Ahmad, S., Tahar, R. M., Muhammad-Sukki, F., Munir, A. B., & Rahim, R. A. (2015). Role of feed-in tariff policy in promoting solar photovoltaic investments in Malaysia: A system dynamics approach. Energy, 84, 808-815. Antonelli, M., & Desideri, U. (2014). The doping effect of Italian feed-in tariffs on the PV market. Energy Policy, 67, 583-594. Benli, H. (2013). Potential of renewable energy in electrical energy production and sustainable energy development of Turkey: Performance and policies. Renewable Energy, 50, 33-46. Bilgen, S., Keleş, S., Kaygusuz, A., Sarı, A., & Kaygusuz, K. (2008). Global warming and renewable energy sources for sustainable development: a case study in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(2), 372-396. Breeze, P. (2014). Power generation technologies. Oxford: Newnes. Brooks, A. E. (2014). Solar Energy: Photovoltaics. In Future Energy (Second Edition) (pp. 383-404): Elsevier. Couture, T., & Gagnon, Y. (2010). An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment. Energy Policy, 38(2), 955-965. Couture, T. D., Cory, K., Kreycik, C., & Williams, E. (2010). Policymaker's guide to feed-in tariff policy design. (No. NREL/TP--6A2-44849). National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States). Çetin, M., & Eğrican, N. (2011). Employment impacts of solar energy in Turkey. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7184-7190. del Río González, P. (2008). Ten years of renewable electricity policies in Spain: An analysis of successive feed-in tariff reforms. Energy Policy, 36(8), 2917-2929. Denholm, P., Drury, E., Margolis, R., & Mehos, M. (2010). Solar energy: the largest energy resource. Generating Electricity in a Carbon-Constrained World, FP Sioshansi, ed., Academic Press, California, 271-302. Dincer, F. (2011). Overview of the photovoltaic technology status and perspective in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 3768-3779. Gazete, R. (2005). 10.05. 2005 tarih ve 5346 sayılı Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarının Elektrik Enerjisi Üretimi Amaçlı Kullanımına İlişkin Kanun. Gazete, R. (2011). 6094 sayılı Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarının Elektrik Enerjisi Üretimi Amaçlı Kullanımına İlişkin Kanunda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun. Resmi Gazete(27809), 20110108-20110103. Gozen, M. (2014). Renewable energy support mechanism in Turkey: Financial analysis and recommendations to policymakers. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(2), 274. Grau, T. (2012). Responsive adjustment of feed-in tariffs to dynamic PV technology development. DIW Discussion Papers, No. 1189, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin. Grau, T. (2014). Comparison of feed-in tariffs and tenders to remunerate solar power generation. DIW Discussion Papers, No. 1363, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin. Guney, M. S. (2016). Solar power and application methods. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 776-785. Haas, R. (2003). Market deployment strategies for photovoltaics: an international review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 7(4), 271-315. Haas, R., Panzer, C., Resch, G., Ragwitz, M., Reece, G., & Held, A. (2011). A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(2), 1003-1034. Holmes, T. P., Adamowicz, W. L., Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J., & Brown, T. C. (2003). A primer on nonmarket valuation. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Hoppmann, J., Huenteler, J., & Girod, B. (2014). Compulsive policy-making—The evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power. Research Policy, 43(8), 1422-1441. Jacobs, D., & Sovacool, B. (2012). Feed-in tariffs and other support mechanisms for solar PV promotion. Comprehensive Renewable Energy, 1, 73-109. Jenner, S. (2012). Did feed-in tariffs work? an econometric assessment. Access:5th Jan 2017, http://www.webmeets.com/files/papers/AIEE/2012/46/Jenner%202012%20Did%20FIT%20work.pdf Klein, A., Held, A., Ragwitz, M., Resch, G., & Faber, T. (2008). Evaluation of different feed-in tariff design options: Best practice paper for the International Feed-in Cooperation. Energy Economics Group & Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research, Germany. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157. Lin, B., & Wesseh Jr, P. K. (2013). Valuing Chinese feed-in tariffs program for solar power generation: a real options analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 474-482. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and applications: Cambridge University Press. Mendonca, M., Jacobs, D., & Sovacool, B. K. (2009). Powering the green economy: The feed-in tariff handbook: Earthscan. Muhammad-Sukki, F., Abu-Bakar, S. H., Munir, A. B., Yasin, S. H. M., Ramirez-Iniguez, R., McMeekin, S. G., . . . Rahim, R. A. (2014). Feed-in tariff for solar photovoltaic: The rise of Japan. Renewable Energy, 68, 636-643. Müller-Mienack, M. (2017). German Renewable Energy Sources Pathway in the New Century. In Renewable Energy Integration (Second Edition) (pp. 373-381): Elsevier. Papadopoulos, Α., & Karteris, M. (2009). An assessment of the Greek incentives scheme for photovoltaics. Energy Policy, 37(5), 1945-1952. Ragwitz, M., Held, A., Resch, G., Faber, T., Huber, C., & Haas, R. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of policy instruments to support renewable electricity in EU Member States. Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research. Energy Economics Group (EEG). Revelt, D., & Train, K. (1998). Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 647-657. Serencam, H., & Serencam, U. (2013). Toward a sustainable energy future in Turkey: An environmental perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 325-333. Simsek, H. A., & Simsek, N. (2013). Recent incentives for renewable energy in Turkey. Energy Policy, 63, 521-530. Topkaya, S. O. (2012). A discussion on recent developments in Turkey's emerging solar power market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), 3754-3765. Towler, B. F. (2014). The future of energy: Academic Press. Tükenmez, M., & Demireli, E. (2012). Renewable energy policy in Turkey with the new legal regulations. Renewable Energy, 39(1), 1-9. Yuksel, I., & Kaygusuz, K. (2011). Renewable energy sources for clean and sustainable energy policies in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 4132-4144.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/5123
dc.description.abstractThe system that generates electricity by directly utilizing solar energy is called photovoltaic (PV) system. In recent years, many countries started to generate electricity by utilizing renewable energy sources to increase their energy supply and to slow down global warming. Considering the current external dependence of Turkey for energy, it is thought that generating electricity from renewable energy sources, especially solar energy, could bring positive results in various aspects. These aspects consist of the reduction of carbon emissions, the provision of energy security, and the creation of new jobs that are safer. Many incentive mechanisms are being implemented around the world to enhance investments in renewable energy sources. The most common one is feed-in tariff (FIT) mechanism. FIT is the long-term agreement between governments and firms investing in solar energy, where governments guarantee to purchase the energy produced by firms. This thesis aims to reveal the optimal FIT design for PV investments in Turkey. Therefore, a questionnaire was designed on the basis of choice experiment (CE) to find out preferences and marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) of investors. The questionnaire was conducted on people working in solar energy firms. After data collection, the MWTP was calculated by using the coefficient obtained from mixed logit model. According to econometric estimations, while FIT design with longer contract duration creates positive MWTP for PV investments, low payment amount per kWh, tax policy for imported PV panels and license fee decrease the attractiveness of PV investments. Key Words: Solar Energy, Photovoltaic Systems, Feed-in Tariff, Choice Experiment, Mixed Logit Model, Willingness to Pay.tr_TR
dc.language.isoentr_TR
dc.publisherSosyal Bilimler Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.titleAn Analysis of The Optimal Design Of Feed-In Tariff Policy For Photovoltaic Investments in Turkeytr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetYenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarından biri olan güneş enerjisinden faydalanarak doğrudan elektrik üretimi sağlayan sistemlere fotovoltaik sistemler denir. Son yıllarda birçok ülke enerji güvenliğini artırmak ve küresel ısınma hızını yavaşlatmak için yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarından faydalanarak elektrik üretmeye başlamıştır. Bugün Türkiye’nin enerji alanındaki dışa bağımlılığını göz önünde bulundurursak, yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarından özellikle güneşten, elektrik üretmesinin birçok açılardan sayısız olumlu etkisi olacağı düşünülmektedir. Karbon salınımının azalması, enerji güvenliğinin sağlanması, daha fazla ve daha güvenli iş alanlarının yaratılması güneş enerjisinden faydalanarak elektrik üretmenin sağladığı başlıca olumlu etkilerdir. Dünyada yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarına yatırımların yapılması için birçok teşvik mekanizması uygulanmaktadır. Bu teşvik mekanizmalarının içinde en yaygın kullanılan mekanizma tarife garantisi mekanizmasıdır. Tarife garantisi, resmi makamlar ile yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarına yatırım yapanlar arasında gerçekleşen uzun dönemli satın alım garantisi sunan bir teşvik mekanizmasıdır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı Türkiye’deki fotovoltaik yatırımlar için en uygun ve en etkin tarife garantisi tasarımını ortaya koymaktır. Bu sebeple yatırımcıların tercihlerini ve marjinal ödeme istekliliklerini açığa çıkarmak için seçim deneyi temelinde bir anket tasarlanmıştır. Anket güneş enerjisi üzerine çalışan şirketlerin personellerine uygulanmıştır. Anketten sağlanan verilerle karma logit modeli kullanılarak yatırımcıların marjinal ödeme istekleri hesaplanmıştır. Bu bağlamda daha uzun sözleşme süresine sahip tarife garantisi tasarımlarının pozitif ödeme istekliliği yarattığı gözlemlenirken, kW saat başına düşük ödeme miktarı, güneş panellerine uygulanan gözetim vergisi ve yarışma temelli katkı payı keşfinin fotovoltaik yatırımlara olan ilgiyi azalttığı gözlemlenmiştir. Anahtar Sözcükler: Güneş Enerjisi, Fotovoltaik Sistemler, Tarife Garantisi, Tercih Deneyi, Karma Logit Modeli, Ödeme İstekliliği.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentİktisattr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Ad:
10195081.pdf
Boyut:
3.725Mb
Biçim:
PDF
Göster/Aç

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster