Basit öğe kaydını göster

Değerler İle Etik Tüketim Davranışları Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi

dc.contributor.advisorHazer, Oya
dc.contributor.authorSaray, Mehveş Tuğçe
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-02T08:00:55Z
dc.date.available2018-10-02T08:00:55Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-06-08
dc.identifier.citationKAYNAKÇA Ağırkan , M., & Karan, M. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinin değer yönelimleri ile psikolojik dayanıklılık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 225-245. doi:10.17556/erziefd.335063 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Elsevier, 50(2), 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Al-Khatib, J. A., Vitell, S. J., & Rawwas, M. Y. (1997). Consumer ethics: A cross‐cultural investigation. European Journal of Marketing, 31(11/12), 750-767. doi:10.1108/03090569710190514 Al-Khatib, J. A., Vitell, S., Rexeisen, R., & Rawwas, M. (2005). Inter-country differences of consumer ethics in Arab countries. International Business Review, 14(4), 495-516. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.04.001 Allport , G. W., Vernon , P., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Study of values : a scale for measuring the dominant interests in personality. Manual / by Allport, Vernon and Lindzey. (3 b.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Al-Wugayan, A., & Rao, C. (2004). An empirical investigation of consumer ethics in a collectivist arab culture: Customer-Retailer relationship (CRR) approach. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 16(3), 25-54. doi:10.1300/J046v16n03_03 Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207-1220. doi:10.1177/0146167203254602 Barni, D., Knafo , A., Asher , B., & Haj-Yahia, M. M. (2014). Parent–child value similarity across and within cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(6), 1-15. doi:10.1177/0022022114530494 Bartels, R. (1967). A model for ethics in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 20-26. doi:10.2307/1249296 Bernstein, P. (1985). Cheating- The new national past time? Business, 34(4), 24-33. https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?hl=tr&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Bernstein%2C+Paul+%281985%29%2C+%E2%80%9CCheating%E2%80%94The+New+National+Pastime%3F%E2%80%9D+Business%2C+35+%284%29%2C+24-33.&btnG= adresinden alındı Bocock, R. (2009). Tüketim. (İ. Kutluk, Çev.) Ankara: Dost Kitabevi. Brady, D., & Gougoumanova , Z. (2011). An analysis of the “core” decision process of the Hunt and Vitell model of ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 4, 1-19. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-analysis-of-the-%E2%80%9C-core-%E2%80%9D-decision-process-of-the-Brady/256dd3e140fac6249e379800714bdc0e84128cc1 adresinden alındı Butenko, T., & Schwartz, S. (2013). Relations of the New Circle of the 19 values to Behaviours. Basic Research Program Working Papers. National Research University Higher School of Economics. Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase. The Journal of Marketing Ethics, 18(7), 560-578. doi:10.1108/07363760110410263 Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don't walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139-158. doi:10.1007/510551-010-0501-6 Cateora, P. (1963). An analysis of the teen-age market. Front Cover. Bureau of Business Research (s. 122). içinde University of Texas. Chan, A., Wong, S., & Leung, P. (1998). Ethical beliefs of Chinese consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1163–1170. doi:10.1023/A:1005760729697 Cieciuch, J., Schwartz , S. H., & Davidov, E. (2015). Values, social psychology of. J. D. Wright içinde, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2 b., Cilt 15, s. 41-46). Oxford: Elsevier. Cordell , V. V., Wongtada , N., & Kieschnick, R. L. (1991). Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. 35(1). doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00009-7 Dasari, R. P. (2017). Value system and value preferences of prospective teachers of secondary schools: An Indian Survey. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(8), 1403-1409. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050814 Davidov, E., Schimdt, P., Billiet, J., & Meuleman, B. (2018 ). Cross-Cultural Analyses Methods and Applications. The second edition. New York: Routledge. Davis, R. M. (1979). Comparison of consumer acceptance of rights and responsibilities, in N. M. Ackerman (ed.). Ethics and the Consumer Interest, 68-70. http://www.sciepub.com/reference/11248 adresinden alındı Demirutku, K., & Sümer, N. (2010). Temel değerlerin ölçümü:Portre Değerler Anketi'nin Türkçe uyarlaması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 13(25), 17-25. http://www.turkpsikolojiyazilari.com/PDF/TPY/25/02.pdf adresinden alındı Demirutku, K., & Tekinay, S. (2016). Beşeri değerler ile devamsızlık tutumları ve gerekçeleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(3), 505-519. doi:10.16986/HUJE.2016016667 DePaulo, P. (1988). Reserach on deception ın marketing communications: Its Relevance To The Study Of Nonverbal Behaviour. ]ournal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 12(4), 253-273. Eğilmez , M. (2010). Makro Ekonomi Türkiye'den Örneklerle (3. Basım b.). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi. Erffmeyer, R. C., Keillor, B. D., & LeClair, D. T. (1999). An empirical investigation of Japanese consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 35-50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25074033?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents adresinden alındı Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87-96. doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1251618.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A2aeea813a2601e2a8238f805d6ef4bbc Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (1989). A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 9(2), 55-64. doi:10.1177/027614678900900207 Finegan, J. (1994). The Impact of personal values on judgement of ethical behaviour in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(9), 747-755. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25072584?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents adresinden alındı Fritzsche, D. J., & Oz, E. (2007). Personal values' influence on the ethical dimension of decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 335-343. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9256-5 Fullerton , S., Kerch, K. B., & Dodge, R. H. (1996). Consumer Ethics: Individual behavior in the market place. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(7), 805-814. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072806 adresinden alındı Furnham, A., & Valgeirsson, H. (2007). The effect of life values and materialism on buying counterfeit products. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(5), 677–685. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2007.01.004 Guttman, L. (1968). A General Nonmetric Technique for Finding the Smallest Coordinate Space for a Configuration of Poınts. Psychoimetrika, 33(4), 469-504. doi:10.1007/BF02290164 Hardy , S. A., Padilla‐Walker , L. M., & Gustavo, K. (2008). Parenting dimensions and adolescents' internalisation of moral values. Journal of Moral Education, 37(2), 205-223. doi: 10.1080/03057240802009512 Hazer, O. (2014, Kasım 7-10). Tüketicilerin etik inançlarının incelenmesi. Z. Çopur , & O. Hazer (Dü.), 1. Uluslararası Aile ve Tüketici Bilimleri Kongresi. Bildiri Kitabı. içinde Antalya. Hess , R. D., & Torney, J. V. (1967). The development of political attitudes in children. Chicago: Aldine Press. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International studies of management & organization, 10(4), 15-41. doi:10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300?journalCode=mimo20 Homer , P., & Kahle, L. (1988). The structural equation test of the value- attitude-behaviour hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638-646. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638 Hourani, G. F. (1969). Ethical Value. New York: Greenwood Press. Hunt , S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5-16. doi:10.1177/027614678600600103 Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics:A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143-153. doi:10.1177/0276146706290923 İnal , H. C., & Günay , S. (2002). Olasılık ve matematiksel istatistik. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları. Jacoby, J. (1971). Multiple-indicant approach for studying new product adopters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(4), 384-388. doi:10.1037/h0031538 Jolson, M. A. (1974). Consumers as offenders. Journal of Business Research, 2(1), 89-98. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(74)80009-3 Kallis , M. J., Krentler , K. A., & Vanier , D. J. (1986). The value of user image in quelling aberrant consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 14(1), 29-35. doi:10.1007/BF02722110 Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163-204. doi:10.1086/266945 Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In: Parsons, T. and Shils, E., Eds., Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674863507.c8 Knoppen, D., & Saris, W. (2009). Evaluation of the Portrait Values Questionnaire using SEM: A New ESS Proposal. QMSS2 seminar, 1112, s. 1-24. Bolzano, Italy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265001803 adresinden alındı Koç , E. (2016). Tüketici davranışı ve pazarlama stratejileri (7. b.). Ankara, Yenimahalle: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Kraut, R. E. (1976). Deterrent and definitional influences on shoplifting. Social Problems, 23(3), 358-368. doi:10.2307/799781 Kuşdil, M. E., & Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Türk öğretmenlerin değer yönelimleri ve Schwartz Değer Kuramı. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(45), 59-76. http://psikiyatridizini.net/articles.aspx?journalid=80&year=2000&volume=15&number=45 adresinden alındı Lindeman , M., & Verkasalo , M. (2005). Measuring values with the short Schwartz's value survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(2), 170-178. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_09 Manyukhina, Y. (2018). Ethical consumption: Practices and identities: A Realist approach. New York: Routledge. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=pX5aDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT19&lpg=PT19&dq=Ethical+consumption:+Practices+and+identities:+A+Realist+approach+citation&source adresinden alındı Marshall , H. R., & Magruder, L. (1960). Relations between parent, money, education practices, and children’s knowledge and use of money. Child Development, 31, 253-284. doi:http://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2061656 Maslow, A. H. (1959). New knowledge in human values. Oxford, England: Harper. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812-825. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.812 McQuilkin, J., Garðarsdóttir, R. B., Thorsteinsson, T., & Schwartz, S. H. (2016). An Icelandic translation and validation of the revised 19-value Portrait Values Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 428-434. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.050 Morris, C. (1956). Varieties of human values. Chicago: Cambridge University Press. https://archive.org/details/varietiesofhuman010598mbp adresinden alındı Muncy, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24(4), 297-312. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(92)90036-B Murphy, P., & Laczniak, G. (1981). Marketing ethics: A review with implications for managers, educators and researchers, in B. Enis and K. Roering (eds.),. Review of Marketing (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 251-266. Münsterberg, H. (1909). The eternal values. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company (The Riverside Press Cambridge). http://www.archive.org/details/eternalvalues00muns: https://archive.org/details/eternalvalues00muns adresinden alındı Newholm , T., & Shaw, D. (2007). The Ethical Consumer. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6, 253-270. doi:10.1002/cb.225 Nunnally , J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2 b.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Odabaşı, Y. (1996). Tüketici Davranışı ve Pazarlama Stratejisi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No.908. Odabaşı, Y., & Barış , G. (2016). Tüketici Davranışı (16. b.). İstanbul: Kapital Medya Hizmetleri. Oles , P. K., & Hermans, H. J. (2010). Allport‐Vernon study of values. B. Weiner, & W. E. Craighead içinde, The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (Cilt 4). doi:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0038 Oyman , M. (2004). Tüketici Etiği: Ülkelerarası bir karşılaştırma ve demografik faktörlere dayalı bir çalışma. Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 78-90. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/113001 adresinden alındı Özdamar, K. (1999). Paket programlar ile veri analizi. Eskişehir: 1. Kaan Kitabevi. Özlem, D. (2004). Etik-Ahlak Felsefesi-. İstanbul: İnkılap Yayınevi. Pallant, J. (2000). Development and validation of a scale to measure perceived control of internal states. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 308-337. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_10 Papatya, N. (2005). Tüketici Davranışları ile İlgili Motivasyon Modelleri: Bir Perakende İşletmesinde Temizlik ve Kişisel Bakım Ürünlerine Bağlı Bir Araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 221-240. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/194941 adresinden alındı Parsons, T., & Shills, E. A. (1951). Values, motives and system of action.In T. Parsons, & E. A. Shills (Eds.), Toward general theory of action (pp. 247-275). New York: Harper Books. Pitts , R. E., Canty , A. L., & Tsalikis, J. (1985). Exploring the impact of personal values on socially oriented communications. Psychology & Marketing, 2, 267-278. doi:10.1002/mar.4220020406 Pojman, L. P. (2006). Ethics; Discovering Right and Wrong. Australia ; Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth. Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1987). Ethics in American companies: A managerial perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(5), 383-391. doi:10.1007/BF00382895 Rallapalli, K. C., Vitell, S. J., Wiebe, F. A., & Barnes, J. H. (1994). Consumer ethical beliefs and personality traits: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Buslness Ethics, 13(7), 487-495. www.jstor.org/stable/25072554. adresinden alındı Rawwas, M. Y. (1996). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of the ethical beliefs of Austrian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(9), 1009-1019. doi:10.1007/BF00705579 Rawwas, M. Y., Patzer, G. L., & Klassen, M. L. (1995). Consumer ethics in cross-cultural settings entrepreneurial implications. European Journal of Marketing,, 29(7), 62-78. doi:10.1108/03090569510095017 Rawwas, M. Y., Vitell, S. J., & Al-Khatib, J. A. (1994). Consumer ethics: The possible effects of terrorism and civil unrest on the ethical values of consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 223-231. doi:10.1007/BF02074821 Rawwas, M. Y., Swaidan, Z., & Oyman, M. (2005). Consumer Ethics: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Ethical Beliefs of Turkish and American Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 183-195. Rawwas, M., Swaidan, Z., & Isakson, H. (2007). A comparative study of ethical beliefs of master of business administration students in the United States with those In Hong Kong. Journal of Education for Business, 82(3), 146-158. doi:10.3200/JOEB.82.3.146-158 Reismen, D., & Roseborough, H. (1955). Careers and consumer behavior. L. Clark (Dü.) içinde, The Life Cycle and Consumer Behavior (Cilt 2, s. 1-18). New York: New York University Press. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press. Ross, M., Schwartz, S., & Surkiss, S. (1999). Basic Individual Values, Work Values, and the Meaning of Work. Applied Psychology, 49-71. Saray, M. T., & Hazer, O. (2017). Etik tüketici ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması; geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğine ilişkin bir çalışma: Hacettepe üniversitesi örneklemi. International Journal of Education Research, 4, 258-283. doi:http://www.ijetsar.com/download/article-file/398442 Sargın, T. (1976). Ahlak Nedir. Karamürsel: Kalyon matbaası. Schwartz , S., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fisher, R., Beierlein, C., . . . Konty, M. (2012). Refining the Theory of Basic Individual Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 1-25. doi:10.1037/a0029393 Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries (Cilt 25). New york: Academic Press: M. Zanna (Ed.). Advances İn Experimental Social Psychology (s. 1-65). doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 Schwartz, S. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x Schwartz, S. (1996). Value priorities and behaviour: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna içinde, The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (Cilt 8, s. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-98834-001 adresinden alındı Schwartz, S. (2003). A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. Kasım 15, 2015 tarihinde Chapter 7 in ESS Questionnaire Development Package of the European Social Survey: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/index.php?option=com_docman&;task=doc_view&gid=126&Itemid=80. adresinden alındı Schwartz, S. (2007). Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(6), 711 - 728. doi:10.1177/0022022107308992 Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550-562. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550 Schwartz, S., & Butenko, T. (2014). Values and behavior: Validating the refined value theory in Russia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 799-813. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2053 Schwartz, S., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010-1028. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010 Schwartz, S., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542. doi:10.1177/0022022101032005001 Shah , S., Tahir, M., Soomro, A. A., & Amjad, S. (2018). Consumers ethics in Pakistan: Empirically examining the Muncy & Vitell scale. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 11, 248-264. doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v11i1.7 Simonson, I., Carmon, Z., Dhar, R., Drolet, A., & Nowlis, S. M. (2001). Consumer research: In search of identity. Annual Review Psychology, 52, 249-275. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.249 Singhapakdi, A., Franke, G. R., & Vitell, S. J. (1999). Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Effects of Perceived Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19-36. Singhapakdi, A., Rawwas, M. R., Marta, J. K., & Ahmed, M. I. (1999). A Cross-cultural study of consumer perceptions about marketing ethics. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(3), 257-272. doi:10.1108/07363769910271496 Sivacek , J. C., & William, D. V. (1982). Interest as a Moderator of Attitude-Behavior Consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 210-221. Solomon, M., Bamossy, G., Askegaard, S., & Hogg, M. K. (2006). Consumer Behaviour a European Perspective. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited. Sortheix, F. M., Parker, P. D., Lechner, C. M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Changes in young Europeans' values during the global financial crisis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1-11. doi:10.1177/1948550617732610 Steenhaut, S., & Kenhove, P. (2006). An empirical investigation of the relationships among a consumer's personal values, ethical ideology and ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 137-155. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-5905-3 Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6(2), 81-97. http://humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her62/62sternetal.pdf adresinden alındı Swaidan, Z. (2012). Culture and consumer Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 201-213. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1070-z Swaidan, Z., Vitell , S. J., & Rawwas, M. (2003). Consumer ethics: Determinants of ethical beliefs of African Americans. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 175-186. doi:10.1023/A:1025068902771 Şengül, H. T. (2001). Tüketim Toplumu, Tüketim Kültürü ve Tüketim Merkezleri. Ege Mimarlık(40), 8-9. http://egemimarlik.org/40-41/index.php adresinden alındı Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th edn.). Boston: Pearson Education. Tavsancıl, E. (2010 ). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Ankara (4.Baskı): Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Tonglet, M. (2001). Consumer misbehaviour:An exploratory study of shoplifting. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1(4), 336-354. doi:10.1002/cb.79 Torresa, C. V., Schwartz, S. H., & Nascimento, T. G. (2016). The Refined Theory of Values: associations with behavior and evidences of discriminative and predictive validity. Psicologia USP, 27(2), 341-356. doi:10.1590/0103-656420150045 Varinli, İ. (2000). Tüketici etiği ve üniversite öğrencilerine yönelik bir araştırma. iktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1), 298-309. http://dergipark.gov.tr/atauniiibd/issue/2681/35177 adresinden alındı Vermillion, L. J., Lassar, W. M., & Winsor, R. D. (2002). The Hunt–Vitell General Theory of Marketing Ethics: Can it Enhance our Understanding of Principal-Agent Relationships in Channels of Distribution? Journal of Business Ethics, 267–285. Vinson, D. E., Scott, J. E., & Lawrence , M. (1977). The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 44-50. doi:10.2307/1250633 Vitell , S. J., Nwachukwu , S. L., & Barnes, J. H. (1993). The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede's Typology. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(10), 753-760. doi:10.1007/BF00881307 Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin , J. R., & Rawwas , M. Y. (1991). Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Elderly Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 365-375. doi:10.1007/BF00383238 Vitell, S. J., & Ho, F. N. (1997). Ethical decision making in marketing: A synthesis and evaluation of scales measuring the various components of decision making in ethical situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(7), 699–717. doi:10.1023/A:101798512 Vitell, S., & Paolillo, J. G. (2003). Consumer ethics: The role of religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 151-162. doi:10.1023/A:1025081005272 Vitell, S., Lumpkin , J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. (1991). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 365-375. doi:10.1007/BF00383238 Vitell, S., Paolillo, J., & Singh, J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 175-181. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-4603-x Vitell, S., Rawwas, M. Y., & Al-Khatib, J. A. (1997). Consumer ethics: a cross‐cultural investigation. European Journal of Marketing, 31(11/12), 750-767. doi:10.1108/03090569710190514 Ward, S. (1974). Consumer socialization. Journal Of Consumer Rerearch, 1(2), 1-14. doi:10.1086/208584 Weeden, C. (2011). Responsible tourist motivation: how valuable is the Schwartz value survey? Journal of Ecotourism, 10(3), 214-134. doi:10.1080/14724049.2011.617448 Werner-Wilson, R. J. (1998). Gender Differences in Adolescent Sexual Attitudes:The Influence of Indıvidual and Family Factors. Adolescence, 519-531. Wilkes, R. (1978). Fraudulent Behaviour by Costumers. Journal of Marketing, 42(4), 67-75. doi:10.2307/1250088tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/5103
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between values and ethical behavior of university students. In line with this aim, it was determined whether there was a statistically significant difference between the socio demographic variables of the university students (sex, age, education class, education level of their parents, perceived family income level) and ethical consumption behaviors. Then, the relationship between the value orientations of university students and ethical consumption behaviors was examined. The sample of the research consisted of 400 university students, 211 female and 189 male. The Consumer Ethics Scale, the Portrait Values Questionnaire and the Personal Information Form were used as data collection tools in the study. The data obtained were analyzed using Correlation, Independent Sampling Test, One-way ANOVA, Multidimensional Scale Analysis (MDS), Levene Test, Bonferroni Test, Tamhane's T2 Test. As a result of the statistical analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between ethic consumption behaviors according to gender, age, education level of mother, perceived family income level of university students participating in the study (p> .05). There was a statistically significant difference (p<.001) between the sub-dimension of “active use of illegal situation” according to the place where university students live. According to the education status of the university students’ fathers, statistically significant differences were found between the consumer ethics scale (p<.001), the subscale of “activelly benefiting from an illegal situation” (p<.001) and the subscale of “no harm no foul” (p <.01) significant difference was observed. A statistically significant relationship was found between the value priorities of university students and ethical consumption behaviors (p<.001). There is no statistically significant relationship between face, power-resources, hedonism, self-direction-behavior, universalism-nature values and ethical consumption behaviors of university students. There was no statistically significant relationship between face, power-resources, power-dominance, hedonism, universalism-nature values and the subscale of activelly benefiting from an illegal situation (p>.05). There was no statistically significant relation between the subscale of no harm no foul with respect to face, power-resources, achievement, self-direction-behavior, universalism-nature, benevolence-dependability, benevolence-caring and security-personal (p<.05). The findings were discussed in light of the literature and suggestions were given in the direction of the results.tr_TR
dc.language.isoturtr_TR
dc.publisherSosyal Bilimler Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectetik tüketim
dc.subjectdeğer
dc.subjectetik tüketim davranışı
dc.subjectüniversite öğrencileri
dc.titleDeğerler İle Etik Tüketim Davranışları Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesitr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetBu araştırmanın amacı, değerler ile üniversite öğrencilerinin etik tüketim davranışları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda öncelikle üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyo demografik değişkenler (cinsiyet, yaş, okudukları sınıf, annelerinin eğitim durumu, babalarının eğitim durumu, algılanan aile gelir düzeyi) ile etik tüketim davranışları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olup olmadığı saptanmıştır. Daha sonra ise, üniversite öğrencilerinin değer yönelimleri ile etik tüketim davranışları arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemi, 211 kadın ve 189 erkek olmak üzere 400 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak, Tüketici Etik Ölçeği, Portre Değerler Anketi ve Kişisel Bilgi Formu kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, Korelasyon, Bağımsız örneklem t testi, Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi (ANOVA), Çok Boyutlu Ölçekleme Analizi (MDS), Levene Testi, Bonferroni Testi, Tamhane’s T2 Testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. İstatistiksel analizler sonucunda araştırmaya katılan üniversite öğrencilerinin cinsiyet, yaş, annelerinin eğitim durumu, algılanan aile gelir düzeyine göre etik tüketim davranışları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık görülmemiştir (p>.05). Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşadıkları yere göre “yasal olmayan bir durumdan aktif bir şekilde yararlanma” alt boyutu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık saptanmıştır (p<.001). Üniversite öğrencilerinin babalarının eğitim durumuna göre hem tüketici etik ölçeği (p<.001), “yasal olmayan bir durumdan aktif bir şekilde yararlanma” alt boyutu (p<.001) ve “zararsız olarak algılanan eylemlerden yararlanma” alt boyutuna (p<.01) göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık görülmüştür. Üniversite öğrencilerinin değer öncelikleri ile etik tüketim davranışları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur (p<.001). Saygınlık, güç-kaynaklar, hazcılık, özyönelim-davranış, evrenselcilik-doğa değerleri ile üniversite öğrencilerinin etik tüketim davranışları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmamıştır (p>.05). Saygınlık, güç-kaynaklar, güç-baskınlık, hazcılık, evrenselcilik-doğa değerleri ile yasal olmayan bir durumdan aktif bir şekilde yararlanma alt boyutu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır (p>.05). Saygınlık, güç-kaynaklar, başarı, özyönelim-davranış, evrenselcilik-doğa, iyilikseverlik-güvenilirlik, iyilikseverlik-sevgi, güvenlik-kişisel değerleri ile zararsız olarak algılanan bir durumdan aktif bir şekilde yararlanma alt boyutu arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır(p>.05). Bulgular literatür ışığında tartışılmış ve ortaya çıkan sonuçlar doğrultusunda öneriler verilmiştir.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentAile ve Tüketici Bilimleritr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID10199503tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Ad:
10199503.pdf
Boyut:
7.207Mb
Biçim:
PDF
Göster/Aç

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster