Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorMetin, Nurgul Orhan
dc.contributor.authorKaraosmanoglu, Ali Devrim
dc.contributor.authorMetin, Yavuz
dc.contributor.authorKarcaaltincaba, Musturay
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T05:51:25Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T05:51:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1305-3825
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5152/dir.2018.17519
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/24167
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE We aimed to describe ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of focal hypersteatosis (FHS). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients with hypersteatosis. Over a 5-year period (February 2005 to September 2010) a total of 17 321 patients underwent abdominal CT scan and 28 patients were determined to have FHS. All patients had US, CT, and MRI studies. Size, area, and density measurements were performed on CT images. Fat signal percentage (FSP) was measured on T1-weighted in-and out-of-phase gradient-echo images. FHS was defined based on MRI findings, as an area of greater signal drop on out-of phase images compared with the rest of the fatty liver. RESULTS The period prevelance of focal hypersteatosis was measured as 0.16% over the 5-year period. Cancer was the most common diagnosis (22 of 28 patients, 78.5%), with the breast (32.1%) and colorectal (25%) cancers predominating. FHS was seen in segment 4 (n=26, 92.8%), segment 8 (n=1, 3.6%), and segment 3 (n=1, 3.6%). Shape was nodular in 21 patients (75%), while triangular or amorphous in the remaining 7 patients (25%). FHS was hyperechoic and isoechoic in 5 (17.9%) and 23 (82.1%) patients, respectively. FHS was hypodense on CT of all patients relative to fatty liver. On MRI, the FHS was hyperintense on T1-weighted in-phase images in 17 patients (60.7%). Median liver parenchymal FSP was 21.5% (range, 10%-41.4%) and median FSP of hypersteatotic area was 32.5% (range, 19%-45%). CONCLUSION Focal hypersteatosis is a pseudolesion that can be observed in patients with liver steatosis. It appears hypodense on CT and mostly isoechoic on US relative to fatty liver. It may mimic metastasis in cancer patients with steatosis, due to nodular shape and atypical location. MRI should be used for correct diagnosis in patients with equivocal findings on CT to avoid biopsy.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionof10.5152/dir.2018.17519
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United States
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleFocal Hypersteatosis: A Pseudolesion In Patients With Liver Steatosis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalDiagnostic And Interventional Radiology
dc.contributor.departmentRadyoloji
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

Attribution 4.0 United States
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: Attribution 4.0 United States