• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Eğitim Fakültesi
  • Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü
  • Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Eğitim Fakültesi
  • Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü
  • Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

AVUSTRALYA-WALDORF VE TÜRKİYE ORTAÖĞRETİM MATEMATİK DERSİ ÖĞRETİM PROGRAMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRMALI OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

View/Open
Eyyüp KARATAŞLI_YENİ TEZ.pdf (3.405Mb)
Date
2019
Author
KARATAŞLI, Eyyüp
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
Acik erisim
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item record
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the similarities and differences between the Australian Steiner Mathematics High School Curriculum Framework (ASHMC) and Turkish National High School Mathematics Curriculum (TNHMC) in terms of aims/learning objectives, content, teaching-learning process and measurement-evaluation process. Based on document analysis, ASHMC, developed in 2011 and updated in 2014 by Steiner Education Australia (SEA), and TNHMC developed by the National Board of Education and started to implement in 2018-2019 academic year, were the main data sources of the study. The data gathered from the official written curricula, namely ASHMC and TNHMC, were analysed by making use of the descriptive analysis. According to the findings, ASHMC was organized more comprehensively and mathematics-specific than TNHMC in terms of aims and competencies. Considering the learning objectives, the results indicated that both of the curricula were dominated with the cognitive domain and rarely included in psychomotor domain. For affective domain, although ASHMC has affective domain objectives, in TNHMC, no reference was found. Considering the teaching-learning process, the findings revealed that ASHMC was more focused on student-centered activities than TNHMC. Regarding the measurement and evaluation, the results indicated that neither mathematics-specific assessment instruments nor examples were suggested in the both curricula. It is expected that the results of the study might provide different perspectives for stakeholders in terms of the curriculum approach embedded in Waldorf Pedagogy as well as the high school mathematics curriculum.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11655/21704
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.Collections
  • Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu [431]
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Açık Erişim Birimi
Beytepe Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 297 6585-117 || Sağlık Bilimleri Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 305 1067
Bizi Takip Edebilirsiniz: Facebook | Twitter | Youtube | Instagram
Web sayfası:www.library.hacettepe.edu.tr | E-posta:openaccess@hacettepe.edu.tr
Sayfanın çıktısını almak için lütfen tıklayınız.
Contact Us | Send Feedback



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


DSpace@Hacettepe
huk openaire onayı
by OpenAIRE

About HUAES
Open Access PolicyGuidesSubcriptionsContact

livechat

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtype

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV