Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGarabli, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorGenc, G. Aydan
dc.contributor.authorKayikci, Mavis E. Kulak
dc.contributor.authorTurkyilmaz, M. Didem
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Burak
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorBelgin, Erol
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-19T07:13:18Z
dc.date.available2019-12-19T07:13:18Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1308-7649
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/20982
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Undetected congenital hearing loss negatively affects the development of child's speech, language, social and cognitive skills. Children who are identified early as having hearing loss and receive intensive early intervention perform better. In our study the objective was to compare hearing screening protocols for infants who has risk factors for hearing loss. Materials and Methods: In this study, infants who have risk factors for hearing loss, hospitalized in Hacettepe University Newborn Intensive Care Unit, included regarding the criteria issued by Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Position Statement 2007. Control group was comprised infants born in Hacettepe University and not having those risk factors for hearing loss. A hundred infants in each group, totally 200 (400 ears) were screened by three different protocols. First protocol used Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission, second protocol used Automated Auditory Brainstem Response and the third protocol used two tools in combination. Tympanometric assessment was done by multi frequency tympanometry in each protocol. Results: Following the statistical comparison of protocols, it has been found that the 1st and 2nd protocols and also the 1st and 3rd protocols cannot be used in place of the other while the 2nd and 3rd protocols can be used in place of one another (p<0,05). Conclusion: It is more effective to use the 3rd protocol which consists of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions, Automated Auditory Brainstem Response in combination and tympanometric measurements.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAves
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectOtorhinolaryngology
dc.titleHearing Screening Protocols Of Babies With Hearing Loss Risk Factors In Turkey
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalJournal Of International Advanced Otology
dc.contributor.departmentOdyoloji
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage216
dc.identifier.endpage222
dc.description.indexWoS


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record