• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi
  • Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü
  • Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi
  • Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü
  • Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effect Of Kınesıotapıng And Knee Brace On Functıonal Performance In Recreatıonal Athletes

View/Open
licence.txt (265bytes)
Ulusoy et al. - 2014 - Effect of Kınesıotapıng and Knee Brace on Functıon.pdf (362.6Kb)
Date
2014
Author
Ulusoy, Burak
İldiz, Bülent
Tunay, Volga Bayrakçı
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item record
Abstract
Objectives: Kinesiotaping is a popular taping method that is used for both therapeutic and performance enchancement purposes. Knee braces are widely used for prevention in sport injuries but their performance effectiveness is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether kinesiotape or brace was more effective on functional performance. Methods: A total twenty male recreational football players (Mean±Standart Deviation (SD) age: 22.5±0.68 years, height: 175.15±3.37 cm, body weight: 74.52±12.41 kg), voluntarily participated in this study. Participants were tested with kinesiotape, with brace and without kinesiotape and brace. Tests were applied one day after patellar kinesiotaping (correction technique). Balance property measured with Modified Y balance Test (dynamic test), agility measured by T test, muscle strength and anaerobic power assessed by vertical jump and triple hop tests. Wilcoxon signed rank test was employed for determining the statistical significance of tests with kinesiotape, with brace and without kinesiotape and brace. Results: In analysis; There were statistically significant differences found in Triple hop test with kinesiotaping and without kinesiotaping and brace, in T test with bracing and kinesiotaping, in vertical jump with kinesiotaping and without kinesiotaping and brace (p<0.001) (in the favour of kinesiotaping in all tests) No statistically significant difference was found in modified Y balance test all groups (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Consequently, kinesiotaping had positive effects on agility and muscle strength but had no effects on balance in football players. On the other hand, brace had no effects on functional performance tests.
URI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967114S00179
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4597676/
http://hdl.handle.net/11655/20914
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.Collections
  • Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Makale Koleksiyonu [159]
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Açık Erişim Birimi
Beytepe Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 297 6585-117 || Sağlık Bilimleri Kütüphanesi | Tel: (90 - 312) 305 1067
Bizi Takip Edebilirsiniz: Facebook | Twitter | Youtube | Instagram
Web sayfası:www.library.hacettepe.edu.tr | E-posta:openaccess@hacettepe.edu.tr
Sayfanın çıktısını almak için lütfen tıklayınız.
Contact Us | Send Feedback



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


DSpace@Hacettepe
huk openaire onayı
by OpenAIRE

About HUAES
Open Access PolicyGuidesSubcriptionsContact

livechat

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeDepartmentPublisherLanguageRightsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_indexFundingxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_subtype

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Theme by 
Atmire NV